D is just too vague. There's a clear distinction between a MOF 2.x Model and a UML 2.x Model, even if only theoretical computer scientists care about the details.

upvoted 0 times

Ivette

1 months ago

D) There is a subtle difference between it and a UML 2.x Model, but only theoretical computer scientists care.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sabra

1 months ago

C) The visual representation resembles a UML 2.x Model, but the underlying Model is a MOF-Model.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chun

1 months ago

B) It can be a valid UML 2.x Model, when certain limitations are observed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gabriele

2 months ago

A) It is always a valid UML 2 x Model

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathrine

2 months ago

A is definitely wrong. A MOF 2.x Model is not always a valid UML 2.x Model. That's like saying a square is always a rectangle.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbye

3 months ago

C seems more accurate to me. The visual representation may resemble UML 2.x, but the underlying model is actually a MOF-based model.

upvoted 0 times

Juan

2 months ago

Yeah, C seems to be the most accurate choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merrilee

2 months ago

I agree, the visual representation may look like UML 2.x, but it's actually a MOF-based model.

upvoted 0 times

...

Curt

2 months ago

I think C is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sol

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eugene

3 months ago

I think B is the correct answer. A MOF 2.x Model can be a valid UML 2.x Model, but only when certain limitations are observed.

upvoted 0 times

Abel

2 months ago

I think C might also be a valid answer. The visual representation resembles UML 2.x, but it's a MOF-Model.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

3 months ago

I agree, B is the correct answer. It can be a valid UML 2.x Model with limitations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elly

3 months ago

I think the answer is B.

upvoted 0 times

...