Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OMSB Exam OMSB_OEN Topic 7 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMSB's OMSB_OEN exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 7
[All OMSB_OEN Questions]

A group of nurses conducting a systematic review to identify best practice evidence for hemodialysis in patient with anemia.

Which of the following should considered based on level of research evidence?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the highest level of evidence in research because they reduce bias and provide the most reliable results. When conducting a systematic review to identify best practice evidence for hemodialysis in patients with anemia, RCTs should be prioritized. These studies provide strong evidence on the efficacy of interventions. Case-control studies, non-experimental studies, and quasi-experimental studies provide valuable information but are considered lower levels of evidence compared to RCTs.


Contribute your Thoughts:

My
3 months ago
I think we should focus on randomized control studies, as they offer the most reliable evidence for best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
3 months ago
D) Randomized control studies all the way. It's like playing Jeopardy with the nurses - you gotta know your stuff!
upvoted 0 times
Barrett
2 months ago
A: I agree, randomized control studies provide the strongest evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
2 months ago
B: Yeah, we need to make sure we're using the best practices for our patients.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Verlene
3 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of research evidence. I say we skip the textbooks and just ask the anemia patients - they probably have the best answers!
upvoted 0 times
Lera
2 months ago
C: Quasi-experimental studies could also be useful to consider in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
3 months ago
B: I agree, those studies provide the highest level of research evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
3 months ago
A: I think we should definitely consider randomized control studies for the systematic review.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryrose
4 months ago
But what about quasi-experimental studies? They can also provide valuable insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
4 months ago
I agree with Gayla, randomized control studies provide the highest level of research evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
4 months ago
Definitely D) Randomized control studies. Anything less would be like trying to perform open-heart surgery with a spork. Not happening!
upvoted 0 times
Wava
3 months ago
I agree, anything less wouldn't be reliable. We need to make sure we're using the most effective methods for our patients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
3 months ago
D) Randomized control studies are definitely the way to go. We need solid evidence for best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gayla
4 months ago
I think we should consider randomized control studies for the systematic review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
4 months ago
I believe non-experimental studies should be considered too, as they can offer real-world perspectives on hemodialysis practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between C) Quasi-experimental studies and D) Randomized control studies. Tough choice, but I think D) is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Shawnna
3 months ago
Let's go with D) Randomized control studies for the systematic review. It's the most reliable option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
4 months ago
Quasi-experimental studies can also provide valuable insights, but D) Randomized control studies offer stronger evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
4 months ago
I agree, D) Randomized control studies are usually considered the gold standard in research.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerald
4 months ago
I think we should also consider quasi-experimental studies, they can provide valuable insights as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
4 months ago
I agree with Erinn, randomized control studies provide the highest level of research evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
4 months ago
I think we should consider randomized control studies for the systematic review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
4 months ago
D) Randomized control studies, of course! That's the gold standard for research evidence.
upvoted 0 times
Leana
3 months ago
D: No, randomized control studies are the gold standard for research evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
3 months ago
C: What about quasi-experimental studies? Should we include those as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
3 months ago
B: I agree, they provide the highest level of research evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
4 months ago
A: I think we should consider randomized control studies for the systematic review.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77