Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-071 Topic 4 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-071 exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 4
[All 1Z0-071 Questions]

Examine the description of the EMPLOYEES table:

Which statement will execute successfully, returning distinct employees with non-null first names?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Felix
2 months ago
D tries to be fancy, but it just ends up being a mess. Stick to the basics, people. A is the winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
2 months ago
Hah, C is hilarious! Comparing first_name to NULL? Really? This is a test, not a comedy routine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C might also work. It uses the not equal operator to check for non-null values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
2 months ago
B is just confusing. DISTINCT should be applied to the entire row, not just the last name. This is a rookie mistake.
upvoted 0 times
Lai
1 months ago
I agree, B is definitely confusing. DISTINCT should be applied to the entire row.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
1 months ago
C) SELECT Distinct * FROM employees WHERE first_ name < > NULL;
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
1 months ago
D) SELECT first_name, DISTINCT last_name FROM employees WHERE first_name <> NULL;
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
1 months ago
I agree, B is definitely confusing. It should be applied to the entire row.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
1 months ago
C) SELECT Distinct * FROM employees WHERE first_name <> NULL;
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
2 months ago
A) SELECT DISTINCT * FROM employees WHERE first_ name IS NOT NULL;
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
2 months ago
A) SELECT DISTINCT * FROM employees WHERE first_name IS NOT NULL;
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paola
3 months ago
I agree with you, Becky. Option A makes sense because it selects distinct employees with non-null first names.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
3 months ago
Option A is the way to go! It's clear and to the point. Why complicate things with extra columns or unnecessary DISTINCT statements?
upvoted 0 times
Clement
2 months ago
Yeah, no need to overcomplicate things. Option A does the job efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janella
2 months ago
I agree, option A is the most straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Becky
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77