Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-076 Topic 7 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-076 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 7
[All 1Z0-076 Questions]

Which four factors can influence the rate of SQL apply on a logical standby database?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, C, E

The rate of SQL apply on a logical standby database can be influenced by:

A: The number of PREPARER processes (which seems to be a typographical error and should read as PREPARER or similar) which prepare the redo data for the applier processes.

B: The number of coordinator processes on the standby database instance which coordinate the SQL apply activities.

C: The number of full table scans performed by SQL apply since full table scans can be resource-intensive and slow down the apply rate.

E: The number of applier processes which apply the redo data to the logical standby database.

Option D is incorrect as the size of the undo tablespace on the logical standby database is more likely to affect the SQL apply lag rather than the rate of SQL apply.

Option F is incorrect because the size of the shared pool would typically not influence the rate of SQL apply. The shared pool is more related to the caching of shared SQL and PL/SQL code and control structures.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ezekiel
4 months ago
Wait, is the undo tablespace even involved in the SQL apply process? I'm going to go with B, E, and F. Gotta keep that shared pool size in mind, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
4 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think the answer is B, C, and E. The size of the shared pool and the number of PREPARE processes don't seem as directly relevant to the SQL apply rate.
upvoted 0 times
Nu
3 months ago
Yeah, I don't think that has as much of an impact as the other factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
3 months ago
I'm not sure about D, the size of the undo tablespace.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
4 months ago
I agree, those factors directly impact the SQL apply rate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
4 months ago
I think the correct factors are B, C, and E.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonna
5 months ago
I think the size of the shared pool can also impact the SQL apply rate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
5 months ago
I believe the number of coordinator processes is crucial as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
5 months ago
D? Really? That's like asking if the color of my socks affects the SQL apply rate. I'm going with B, C, and E, for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about D. The size of the undo tablespace doesn't seem like it would directly affect the SQL apply rate. I'd go with A, B, and E.
upvoted 0 times
Cammy
5 months ago
Yeah, I see your point. A, B, and E are probably the main ones to focus on for improving SQL apply rate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
5 months ago
I think D could still have an impact, but A, B, and E are definitely important factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leah
5 months ago
I agree, but I also think the size of the undo tablespace plays a role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
5 months ago
I think the correct answer is B, C, and E. The number of coordinator processes, full table scans, and applier processes can definitely impact the SQL apply rate on a logical standby database.
upvoted 0 times
Rupert
4 months ago
Agreed, having enough applier processes is also important for optimal performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
4 months ago
I believe the number of coordinator processes is crucial for efficient apply.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brendan
4 months ago
Yes, you're right. Those factors can definitely influence the SQL apply rate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
5 months ago
I think the correct answer is B, C, and E.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorothy
6 months ago
I think the number of applier processes is important for SQL apply rate.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77