Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-082 Topic 3 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-082 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 3
[All 1Z0-082 Questions]

Which three statements are true about sequences in a single instance Oracle database?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Annabelle
6 months ago
I agree with It makes sense that only a DBA would have the authority to drop a sequence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
6 months ago
I believe statement E is true, a sequence can only be dropped by a DBA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
6 months ago
I don't think so, That doesn't sound right to me either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
6 months ago
I'm not sure about statement D. Can two tables really have keys generated from the same sequence?
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
6 months ago
I agree with But I also think statement C is true, the cached values are lost if the instance shuts down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
6 months ago
I think statement A is true because sequences can indeed have gaps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
6 months ago
I agree with statement E), a sequence can only be dropped by a DBA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
6 months ago
I don't think statement D) is true, it doesn't make sense for tables to have keys from the same sequence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
6 months ago
I'm not sure about statement D), can two or more tables have keys generated from the same sequence?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
7 months ago
I believe that statement C) is true, unallocated cached values are indeed lost if the instance shuts down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
7 months ago
I disagree, sequences can issue duplicate values according to statement B).
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
7 months ago
I think statement A) is true because sequences can have gaps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
8 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writer is just trying to trip us up with this one. They probably want us to overthink it. I'm going to go with my gut on this - A, C, and F seem the most reliable to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit uncertain about B. I thought sequences were designed to avoid duplicate values, but maybe there's some edge case where it could happen. And F, I'm not sure if that's true or not. Guess I'll have to review my sequence knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
8 months ago
I think D is true - two or more tables can't use the same sequence to generate keys. That would cause all sorts of problems. And E, I believe a sequence can only be dropped by a DBA, not a regular user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
8 months ago
I agree with Denae on those three options. But I'm not sure about the others. B seems false - a sequence should never issue duplicate values. And D and E, I'm not confident about those.
upvoted 0 times
Bernardo
6 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think that's possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
6 months ago
What about D and E? Can two tables have keys from the same sequence?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
7 months ago
I agree, that sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
7 months ago
I think B is false too. Sequences should not issue duplicate values.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denae
8 months ago
Hmm, I think options A, C, and F are true. Sequences can have gaps if you don't use them consecutively, and if the instance shuts down, any unallocated cached values are lost. And if a transaction fails, the sequence number that was allocated can be rolled back.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
8 months ago
I'm not too sure about this question. It seems to cover a lot of different aspects of sequences in Oracle, and I'm not familiar with all the nuances. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77