Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-084 Topic 4 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-084 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 4
[All 1Z0-084 Questions]

Which two statements are true about the use and monitoring of Buffer Cache Hit ratios and their value in tuning Database I/O performance?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

A high buffer cache hit ratio typically indicates that the database is effectively using the buffer cache and does not often need to read data from disk. However, this metric alone is not a reliable indicator of the I/O performance of the database for several reasons:

Full table scans and fast full index scans (A) can bypass the buffer cache by design if the blocks are not deemed reusable shortly, which can impact the cache hit ratio.

A high cache hit ratio (B) can be misleading if the database performance is poor due to other factors, such as inefficient queries or contention issues.

The buffer cache advisory (C) is a more valuable tool for understanding the potential impact of different cache sizes on the database's I/O performance. It simulates scenarios with different cache sizes and provides a more targeted recommendation.

The RECYCLE and KEEP buffer caches (D) are specialized caches designed for certain scenarios. While high hit ratios can be beneficial, they are not universally required; some workloads might not be significantly impacted by lower hit ratios in these caches.

A lower cache hit ratio (E) does not necessarily mean poor I/O performance. In some cases, a system with a well-designed storage subsystem and efficient queries might perform well even with a lower cache hit ratio.

Reference

Oracle Database 19c Performance Tuning Guide - Buffer Cache Hit Ratio

Oracle Database 19c Performance Tuning Guide - v$db_cache_advice


Contribute your Thoughts:

Dortha
2 months ago
Cache hit ratios are like dating - you want the right balance, not too high or too low. Goldilocks would approve of option E.
upvoted 0 times
Mertie
17 days ago
So, it's important to find the right balance in cache hit ratios, just like in dating.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
26 days ago
Yes, that's correct. The v$db_cache_advice view helps in tuning database I/O performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tina
27 days ago
But isn't it true that the buffer cache advisory view provides advice on appropriate cache hit ratios?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
1 months ago
I think option E is correct, a 60% cache hit ratio is good for I/O performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sanjuana
2 months ago
I wonder if the exam will have a question on 'How to keep the cache warm and toasty?' Gotta love those database puns!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
2 months ago
A 60% cache hit ratio can indicate good I/O performance in some cases. Option E seems plausible.
upvoted 0 times
Johnathon
22 days ago
Having a high cache hit ratio for both RECYCLE and KEEP buffer caches is important for performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeann
26 days ago
I think the buffer cache advisory view can provide helpful advice on cache hit ratios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
1 months ago
I agree, a 60% cache hit ratio can still indicate good I/O performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janae
2 months ago
The RECYCLE and KEEP caches should have varying hit ratios based on the workload. Option D is not always true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
2 months ago
The v$db_cache_advice view provides great advice on cache hit ratios, so option C is true.
upvoted 0 times
Amber
1 months ago
I think option E is also true, a 60% cache hit ratio can indicate good I/O performance in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
1 months ago
I agree, having a high cache hit ratio for both the RECYCLE and KEEP buffer caches is important for optimal performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
1 months ago
Option C is definitely true, the v$db_cache_advice view is really helpful for tuning database performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elmer
2 months ago
I believe statement A is also true because full table scans and fast full index scans are affected by cache hit ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
2 months ago
I agree with you, Felix. Statement C seems logical for tuning database I/O performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
2 months ago
A 99% cache hit ratio doesn't always mean good I/O performance. Option B is false.
upvoted 0 times
Dierdre
1 months ago
E) A 60% cache hit ratio can be observed for database instances which have very good I/O performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
2 months ago
D) Both the RECYCLE and KEEP buffer caches should always have a very high cache hit ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
2 months ago
C) The buffer cache advisory view v$db_cache_advice provides advice on cache hit ratios appropriate for the instance workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
2 months ago
A) The performance of workloads that primarily generate full table scans and fast full index scans are always affected by the cache hit ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felix
2 months ago
I think statement C is true because v$db_cache_advice provides advice on cache hit ratios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
3 months ago
The performance of workloads with full table scans and index scans is definitely affected by the cache hit ratio. I agree with option A.
upvoted 0 times
Billi
2 months ago
It's important to monitor and tune the database I/O performance to optimize the cache hit ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
2 months ago
I agree, those types of workloads can really impact the cache hit ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
2 months ago
I think option A is correct. Full table scans and index scans are definitely affected by the cache hit ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77