Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-1066-24 Topic 6 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1066-24 exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 6
[All 1Z0-1066-24 Questions]

Your buyers are very attentive in maintaining the approved supplier lists as needed. One of your planners regularly uses the portal to communicate with some of their key suppliers and has noticed that the publication process is taking a lot longer to complete because the business has grown. The planner is also complaining that the collaboration candidates' list is cluttered with items that are not yet required.

Which two steps should you take to address the planner's complaint?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

To improve performance and reduce unnecessary items in the collaboration candidates list, you can activate settings to ignore zero forecast combinations, which prevents items with no forecast from appearing in the candidates list. Additionally, activating the 'Ignore for Supplier Collaboration' attribute for specific items ensures that these are excluded from supplier collaboration processes, streamlining the list to relevant items only. These options help in managing supply collaboration settings efficiently and are verified in Oracle documentation on Supply Chain Collaboration and Publish Order Forecast processes

.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Avery
18 days ago
Wait, so they're using a portal to communicate with suppliers? That's so high-tech! I'm still over here faxing purchase orders. But seriously, I agree with Heike - options B and C seem like the logical choices to address the planner's issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 months ago
Haha, this reminds me of the time our supply chain coordinator tried to automate the entire process. Needless to say, it didn't end well. Anyway, I think options B and C sound like the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
1 months ago
Hmm, interesting. The planner is complaining about the cluttered collaboration candidates' list, so disabling the decomposition and generate candidates' parameters (option D) might be a good solution. But I'm not sure about that 'ignore zero forecast combinations' thing in option A.
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
19 days ago
Let's try option D first and see if it improves the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
26 days ago
I'm not sure about option A though, it might be worth looking into further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
1 months ago
Yeah, disabling decomposition could help streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
1 months ago
I think option D makes sense to clean up the cluttered list.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Doyle
2 months ago
I agree with Leah. Option A might also be useful in speeding up the publication process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
2 months ago
I think option B could help declutter the collaboration candidates' list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
2 months ago
This question seems to be about managing supplier collaboration and publication processes. I think options B and C could be the way to go, as they seem to address the main issues mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
Glory
7 days ago
Agreed, let's implement B and C and monitor the results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
11 days ago
Let's try both options and see if it improves the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
1 months ago
I think option B could help clean up the cluttered list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
1 months ago
Option C might also be useful for faster publication process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77