Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-1067-23 Topic 3 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1067-23 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 3
[All 1Z0-1067-23 Questions]

You are asked to deploy a new application that has been designed to scale horizontally. The business stakeholders have asked that the application be deployed in us-phoenix-1. Nor-mal usage requires 2 OCPUs. You expect to have few spikes during the week, that will require up to 4 OCPUs, and a major usage uptick at the end of each month that will require 8 OCPUs. What is the most cost-effective approach to implement a highly available and scalable solution? (Choose the best answer.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Karma
2 months ago
What, no Option E: 'Hire a team of cloned supercomputers to handle the workload'? I'm disappointed.
upvoted 0 times
Kimbery
1 months ago
A) Create an instance with 1 OCPU shape. Use the Resize Instance action to scale up to a larger shape when more resources are needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
1 months ago
C) Create an instance pool with a VM.Standard2.2 shape instance configuration. Set up the autoscaling configuration to use 2 availability domains and have a minimum of 2 instances, to handle the weekly spikes, and a maximum of 4 instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
1 months ago
A) Create an instance with 1 OCPU shape. Use the Resize Instance action to scale up to a larger shape when more resources are needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marilynn
2 months ago
Option B is a bit too manual. I prefer the automated scalability of the instance pool options.
upvoted 0 times
Nina
1 months ago
C sounds like the best option for handling the spikes and major usage upticks efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
1 months ago
C) Create an instance pool with a VM.Standard2.2 shape instance configuration. Set up the autoscaling configuration to use 2 availability domains and have a minimum of 2 instances, to handle the weekly spikes, and a maximum of 4 instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
2 months ago
A) Create an instance with 1 OCPU shape. Use the Resize Instance action to scale up to a larger shape when more resources are needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roselle
2 months ago
I'd go with Option D. Having a max of 8 instances should handle the major usage uptick at the end of each month.
upvoted 0 times
Cornell
2 months ago
Definitely, it's important to be prepared for those spikes in usage at the end of each month.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
2 months ago
Creating an instance pool with a VM.Standard2.1 shape seems like a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
2 months ago
I agree, having a maximum of 8 instances should provide the scalability needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
2 months ago
Option D sounds like the best choice for handling the major usage uptick.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tina
3 months ago
I'm not sure, I think option D could also work well for handling the spikes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
3 months ago
I agree with Haley, option C seems to be the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
3 months ago
Option C seems the most reasonable choice. Using an instance pool with autoscaling will ensure high availability and cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
Merissa
1 months ago
Definitely, having a minimum and maximum number of instances set up will help manage the resource usage efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
2 months ago
It's important to have the right configuration to ensure scalability and cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
2 months ago
I agree, setting up an instance pool with autoscaling will help handle the spikes effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
2 months ago
I think option C is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
3 months ago
Yeah, having the ability to automatically adjust the number of instances based on demand will definitely help with managing costs and ensuring availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
3 months ago
I agree, option C with the instance pool and autoscaling seems like the best choice for scalability and cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Haley
3 months ago
I think the best approach is option C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77