Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-1067-23 Topic 6 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1067-23 exam

Question #: 10
Topic #: 6

[All 1Z0-1067-23 Questions]

Multiple teams are sharing a tenancy in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). You are asked to figure out an appropriate method to manage OCI costs. Which is NOT a valid technique to accurately attribute costs to resources used by each team? (Choose the best answer.)

ACreate an Identity and Access Management (IAM) group for each team. Create an OCI budget for each group to track spending.

BCreate separate compartment for each team. Use the OCI cost analysis tools to filter costs by compartment.

CCreate a Cost-Tracking tag. Apply this tag to all resources with team information. Use the OCI cost analysis tools to filter costs by tags.

DDefine and use tags for resources used by each team. Analyze usage data from the OCI Usage Report which has detailed information about resources and tags.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Kallie at Feb 08, 2024, 04:34 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-1067-23 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Herminia

1 years ago

I think using AS PATH prepending with routes could also be a valid option. It helps in manipulating the path selection process for BGP routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lou

1 years ago

I see your point, but I believe BGP is the more commonly used method for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ollie

1 years ago

But what about option B? Adjusting one of the connections to have a higher ASN could also work, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Royal

1 years ago

I agree with Lou, enabling BGP would allow for active/passive setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lou

1 years ago

I think the best answer is A) Enable BGP on the FastConnect you want as the ACTIVE connection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgiana

1 years ago

I don't think changing the ASN is necessary. Using AS PATH prepending should be enough to achieve the desired architecture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shizue

1 years ago

What about adjusting the connection to have a higher ASN? Could that be a potential solution?

upvoted 0 times

...

Theola

1 years ago

I agree with Cherry, enabling BGP would help in determining the best path for our traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherry

1 years ago

I think the best way to achieve ACTIVE/PASSIVE architecture is by enabling BGP on the FastConnect connection.

upvoted 0 times

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77