Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-1084-24 Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1084-24 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All 1Z0-1084-24 Questions]

A company is developing a new application that needs to process transactions in real time. The company wants to ensure that all transactions are processed in order and that no transaction is lost. Which of these is a correct strategy for leveraging OCI Queue in this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Quinn
2 months ago
But wouldn't using separate queues help in ensuring that transactions are processed in order and not lost?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of queues. I'm just happy I don't have to sort them by hand anymore, that was a real pain. Option B definitely gets my vote.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
3 months ago
C seems a bit overkill, having a separate queue for each instance? That's just asking for trouble if you need to scale. I'd go with B, keep it simple.
upvoted 0 times
Gaynell
1 months ago
A: Agreed, let's go with B to ensure all transactions are processed in order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
2 months ago
B: Yeah, having separate queues for each instance could get messy. B sounds more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
2 months ago
A: I think B is the way to go, keep it simple and process all transactions in one queue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mickie
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe using a single queue to process all transactions would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
3 months ago
D sounds interesting, using a priority queue could be useful for prioritizing critical transactions. Hmm, I wonder if that would add unnecessary complexity though.
upvoted 0 times
Harrison
1 months ago
Vallie: That's true, we need to balance between prioritizing transactions and keeping the system simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
2 months ago
It might make the system more complex though, maybe we should consider the trade-offs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
2 months ago
I think using a priority queue could help ensure important transactions are processed first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
2 months ago
D sounds like a good idea, prioritizing critical transactions is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quinn
3 months ago
I think using a separate queue for each type of transaction is the best strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
3 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. A single queue to handle all transactions ensures order and no loss, simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
Lelia
3 months ago
Using a single queue for all transactions does sound like a good strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
3 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77