Wait, aren't encoder and decoder models used in things like machine translation? I think option D makes the most sense in that context. Gotta love the NLP jargon, though!
Haha, this question is giving me flashbacks to my machine learning class. All these encoder-decoder models start to blend together after a while. I'm just going to go with D and hope for the best.
Hmm, I was thinking option C was the right answer. Isn't that how most language models work, where the encoder predicts the next word and the decoder translates it back to text? But I could be wrong.
I see your point, but I believe option A is more accurate. Both encoder and decoder models convert words into vector representations without generating new text.
I agree with you, option D seems to make more sense. The encoder creates a vector representation, and the decoder uses it to generate a sequence of words.
I see your point, but I still believe option C is more accurate. The encoder predicts the next word, while the decoder converts the sequence into a numerical representation.
Okay, I think option D is the correct answer. The encoder model converts the sequence of words into a vector representation, and the decoder model then takes this vector representation and generates the sequence of words.
Yes, that's correct. The encoder model creates a vector representation of the input text, and the decoder model generates the output text based on that representation.
Lashawn
5 months agoSabina
5 months agoMartina
5 months agoCathrine
3 months agoLinn
3 months agoNoelia
4 months agoDeja
4 months agoNgoc
4 months agoDwight
4 months agoCandra
4 months agoJoesph
5 months agoLeatha
5 months agoLucina
5 months agoQuentin
4 months agoHubert
4 months agoJoni
5 months agoMozelle
5 months agoJoni
6 months ago