Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-133 Topic 16 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-133 exam
Question #: 98
Topic #: 16
[All 1Z0-133 Questions]

You monitor a running JDBC data source with the console and note the following values:

Current Capacity = 10

Current Capacity High Count = 20

Identify two plausible explanations for these metrics. (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: E, F

Contribute your Thoughts:

Paola
4 months ago
I'm going with C and F as well. Seems like a classic case of overcompensating for a spike in workload. Gotta love those JDBC data sources, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Marcos
4 months ago
Yeah, definitely. It's important to adjust the pool size accordingly to avoid any performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
4 months ago
I think C and F make sense. The pool size probably increased to handle the higher workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
4 months ago
Ha! I bet the developers were like, 'Let's just double the pool size, that'll fix it!' Classic case of C and F, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Shoshana
3 months ago
Hester: Definitely a common mistake in trying to optimize performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hester
3 months ago
Maybe they thought it would improve performance, but it ended up causing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
3 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Increasing the pool size could explain the high count.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslie
4 months ago
Maybe the statement cache size is 20.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latonia
4 months ago
This is a tricky one! I'm going with the pool size increase (C) and the statement cache size being 20 (B). The high count of 20 could mean the cache was larger, which would help explain the current capacity of 10.
upvoted 0 times
Glen
3 months ago
That makes sense, it could have helped with the workload
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
3 months ago
The statement cache size is 20 (B)
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
4 months ago
I agree, that could explain the higher current capacity
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
4 months ago
I think the pool size has increased (C)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kris
5 months ago
I agree with Cora on the pool size increase (C) and higher workload (F). The current capacity of 10 and the high count of 20 indicate that the pool was expanded to meet the demand, but the workload has since decreased.
upvoted 0 times
Lanie
4 months ago
So, the pool size was expanded to handle the workload, but now it's not as high. Got it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
4 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It could also be that the workload was higher before (F) and has decreased now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
4 months ago
I think the pool size has increased (C) because the current capacity is 10 and the high count is 20.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgeanna
5 months ago
I believe the workload was higher than it is now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
5 months ago
Hmm, I think the pool size has increased (C) and the workload was higher than it is now (F). The high count of 20 for the current capacity suggests that the pool size was expanded to handle the increased workload.
upvoted 0 times
Rhea
4 months ago
Yes, it makes sense that the current capacity high count is higher if the workload was higher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
5 months ago
I agree, the pool size must have increased to accommodate the higher workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Victor
5 months ago
I think the pool size has increased.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77