Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-134 Topic 5 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-134 exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 5
[All 1Z0-134 Questions]

One server in your WebLogic domain is experiencing a problem. You want to use the WebLogic Diagnostic Framework (WLDF) to diagnose the problem. The default built-in WLDF module is currently configured on the server, but it does not capture the metrics you need.

You have the following requirements:

You do not want to delete the existing module.

You want to minimize metric data output while troubleshooting the issue.

You want to focus your analysis on only the server that is experiencing the problem.

What WLDF configuration would achieve this result? (Choose the best answer.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shonda
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the test writers were just sitting around thinking 'how can we make this question as simple as possible?' Option D is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Stefanie
2 months ago
Yeah, it's the most straightforward solution to the issue at hand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
2 months ago
I agree, creating a new module and targeting it to the server with the problem makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
2 months ago
Option D is definitely the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merrilee
3 months ago
D is definitely the correct answer. Gotta love it when the options give you a clear, straightforward solution like that. Makes my job as a test taker much easier.
upvoted 0 times
Janey
2 months ago
D is the way to go. It's simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
2 months ago
I would go with D as well. It's the most direct way to address the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
2 months ago
Yeah, D is the best option for sure. It's clear and to the point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
2 months ago
I agree, D seems like the most logical choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawnda
3 months ago
D targets the new module to the server with the problem specifically, which aligns with the requirement to focus the analysis on that server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
3 months ago
Why do you think D is better than A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
3 months ago
I agree, D is the way to go. Minimizing the metric data output and focusing on the problem server is key. No need to complicate things by targeting the whole cluster.
upvoted 0 times
Truman
2 months ago
Agreed, targeting the server with the problem will help narrow down the troubleshooting process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
2 months ago
D is definitely the best option. It's important to focus on the specific server with the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawnda
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe D is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
3 months ago
I think the best answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
4 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice here. Deactivating the existing module and creating a new one targeted specifically to the problem server is the most efficient way to troubleshoot without affecting the entire cluster.
upvoted 0 times
Mayra
2 months ago
Let's go ahead and deactivate the existing module and create a new one for the problem server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
2 months ago
That makes sense, we don't want to disrupt the entire cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
2 months ago
Agreed, it allows us to focus on the specific server with the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
3 months ago
I think option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
3 months ago
I think creating a new module for targeted troubleshooting is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
3 months ago
Agreed, it allows us to focus on the server with the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
3 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77