Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Oracle Exam 1Z0-344 Topic 12 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-344 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 12
[All 1Z0-344 Questions]

There are three BSSV servers: BSSV1 and BSSV2 on Machine M1 and BSSV3 on Machine M2. How would you cluster these servers to attain high availability?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Shoshana at May 21, 2024, 06:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-344 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Vallie
6 months ago
Hold up, is this a trick question? I'm pretty sure the answer is C. Vertical clustering for BSSV1 and BSSV3, and then horizontal for BSSV2. That's the only way to keep those servers dancin'!
upvoted 0 times
...
Willis
6 months ago
Vertical clustering? Horizontal clustering? Sounds like a fancy dance move to me! But for real, I think option D is the way to go - horizontal clustering all the way, baby!
upvoted 0 times
Allene
5 months ago
Definitely, horizontal clustering is the way to go for better availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
5 months ago
I agree, horizontal clustering within all three servers makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
6 months ago
I think option D is the best choice for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adelaide
6 months ago
I'd go with option E. Vertical clustering for BSSV1 and BSSV2, then horizontal for BSSV3. Spread that high availability goodness around!
upvoted 0 times
Janessa
5 months ago
Yeah, vertical clustering for BSSV1 and BSSV2 makes sense, then horizontal clustering for BSSV3 to balance it out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
6 months ago
User2
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
6 months ago
I agree, option E seems like the best choice for spreading out the high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
6 months ago
Yeah, vertical clustering for BSSV1 and BSSV2 makes sense, then horizontal clustering for BSSV3 to balance it out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
6 months ago
I agree, option E seems like the best choice for spreading out the high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
6 months ago
User1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raelene
7 months ago
Hmm, vertical clustering within all three servers seems like the way to go. Gotta keep those BSSV servers running smoothly!
upvoted 0 times
Lisandra
6 months ago
Interesting approach, focusing on vertical clustering first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
6 months ago
Hmm, vertical clustering within all three servers seems like the way to go. Gotta keep those BSSV servers running smoothly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
6 months ago
E) vertical clustering within BSSV1 and BSSV2, and then horizontal clustering in BSSV3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
6 months ago
That could work too, spreading the load horizontally.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
6 months ago
A) vertical clustering within all three servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
6 months ago
B) vertical clustering within BSSV2 and BSSV3, and then horizontal clustering in BSSV1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
7 months ago
Really? I would have thought horizontal clustering would be better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
7 months ago
A) vertical clustering within all three servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77