Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-344 Topic 4 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-344 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 4
[All 1Z0-344 Questions]

There are three BSSV servers: BSSV1 and BSSV2 on Machine M1 and BSSV3 on Machine M2. How would you cluster these servers to attain high availability?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Louvenia
4 months ago
Alright, let's go with E. Vertical clustering in BSSV1 and BSSV2, then horizontal in BSSV3. It's like a good sandwich – you've got your bread (vertical) and your filling (horizontal). Delicious!
upvoted 0 times
Kaitlyn
3 months ago
Definitely, it's a good way to visualize the clustering strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
4 months ago
I like the sandwich analogy, it makes it easier to understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
4 months ago
Agreed, that way we can ensure high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
4 months ago
Sounds like a plan. Vertical in BSSV1 and BSSV2, then horizontal in BSSV3.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mari
5 months ago
Wait, hold on. What if we mix it up a bit? Vertical clustering in some places, horizontal in others? That's the kind of outside-the-box thinking that gets you the big bucks, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aracelis
5 months ago
I agree with Kathryn, option E seems like the best choice for clustering the servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. We've got two machines, and three BSSV servers. Horizontal clustering makes sense to me, but I'm also open to a little bit of vertical action on the side.
upvoted 0 times
Nada
3 months ago
E) vertical clustering within BSSV1 and BSSV2, and then horizontal clustering in BSSV3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selene
3 months ago
B) vertical clustering within BSSV2 and BSSV3, and then horizontal clustering in BSSV1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
3 months ago
A) vertical clustering within all three servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
4 months ago
Let's go with that plan then, vertical clustering in BSSV1 and BSSV2, and horizontal clustering in BSSV3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
4 months ago
I agree, vertical clustering in BSSV1 and BSSV2 seems like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
4 months ago
I think option E could work well for us.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kathryn
5 months ago
But vertical clustering in BSSV1 and BSSV2 makes more sense for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
5 months ago
Hmm, vertical clustering seems like the way to go here. I mean, who doesn't love a good ol' vertical stack of servers, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
German
4 months ago
Agreed, it's all about maximizing performance and minimizing downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
4 months ago
Definitely, vertical clustering can help distribute the load efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
4 months ago
That sounds like a solid plan. High availability is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
5 months ago
Vertical clustering within BSSV1 and BSSV2, and then horizontal clustering in BSSV3
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Genevieve
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathryn
6 months ago
I think option E sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77