Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-434 Topic 2 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-434 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 2
[All 1Z0-434 Questions]

Results catching has been configured on a business service. A previously cached result has been flushed from the cache.

Which two events may have occurred?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17904_01/apirefs.1111/e15034/Service.html

Contribute your Thoughts:

Nadine
3 months ago
I'm not sure about option A, but I think option B is unlikely. Updating the WSDL resource shouldn't necessarily flush the cached result.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
3 months ago
I believe option C is also a valid possibility. If the back-end service is unavailable, the cached result would have been flushed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
3 months ago
I agree with you, Deandrea. Option D makes sense as the back-end service could have returned a different response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
3 months ago
I think option D is possible because the cached result may have been updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
4 months ago
I believe option D could also be a valid reason. The back-end service returning a different response could trigger the flushing of the cached result.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
4 months ago
I'll go with B and D. Although, now I'm wondering if the backend team was just having a bad day and decided to 'accidentally' return a different response. Gotta love those passive-aggressive developers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
4 months ago
I agree with Darnell, option C makes sense. The cached result may have been flushed due to the back-end service being unavailable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
4 months ago
Haha, I bet the backend engineer was just messing with the team and updated the WSDL as a prank. Classic IT hijinks!
upvoted 0 times
Otis
3 months ago
D) The back-end service has returned a different response for the cache key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
4 months ago
A) Result catching has been disabled for the business service.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darnell
4 months ago
I think option C is possible because the back-end service may have become unavailable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
4 months ago
I'm going with B and D too. It's either a change on the service side or a change in the response. Can't be that the service went down, that would just return an error, not flush the cache.
upvoted 0 times
Denny
3 months ago
Agreed. It's more likely a change in the service or response that caused the cache to be flushed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
3 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It's unlikely that the service went down completely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
4 months ago
I think it's B and D as well. The service must have been updated or the response changed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nettie
4 months ago
B and D seem like the most likely options here. If the WSDL resource was updated, that could invalidate the cached result. And if the backend service returned a different response, that would also flush the cache.
upvoted 0 times
Cyril
4 months ago
Definitely, maintaining the cache consistency is crucial for the overall system performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
4 months ago
It's important to keep an eye on those changes to avoid any unexpected results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
4 months ago
I agree, updating the WSDL or getting a different response from the backend service would definitely flush the cache.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janella
4 months ago
I think B and D are the most likely events that occurred.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77