Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-497 Topic 4 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-497 exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 4
[All 1Z0-497 Questions]

Why does performance degrade when many UPDATE, INSERT, or DELETEstatements are issued on a table that has an associated bitmap index?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Bitmap indexes in currently ''supported'' versions of Oracle are maintained in a much more efficient manner than they were previously, to the point where the need for frequently rebuilds has been much reduced, even in tables in which such indexes are not dropped during heavy loads.

That said, Bitmap indexes are still unsuitable in OLTP type environments (even in 11g or later) due to the locking implications associated with them.

Note: bitmap indexes are only suitable for static tables and materialized views which are updated at nigh and rebuilt after batch row loading.

Not B: Like b-tree indexes, bitmap indexes should be rebuilt (ALTER INDEX . . . REBUILD) if there is a lot of DML (UPDATE, INSERT, DELETE) activity.

Not A: Since 10g,Oracle issignificantly more efficient and where possible will simply adjust the current rowidrange of the Bitmap index entry and modify the bitmap string accordingly to accommodatea new row value (resulting in an overall increase of just 2 bytes overall in this example) rather than create a totally new index entry (which required an additional 21 bytes in the 9i example).


Contribute your Thoughts:

Alva
2 months ago
Ah, the joys of bitmap indexes. Option D sounds like a good explanation for the performance hit.
upvoted 0 times
Ula
18 days ago
I guess all these factors combined can really affect performance when dealing with bitmap indexes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
20 days ago
True, the bitmap segments being locked in option C could also contribute to the degradation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
21 days ago
But doesn't option A also play a role? Recreating the index blocks seems like it could impact performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
22 days ago
I think option D makes sense, removing NULL values can slow things down.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephane
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the developers who designed this index are regretting their choices right about now! Option C is my pick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option A. Rebuilding the bitmap index blocks after each DML statement would definitely impact performance.
upvoted 0 times
Casie
21 days ago
Yeah, it seems like a logical explanation for why performance would degrade with many DML statements on a table with a bitmap index.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
24 days ago
I agree, that could definitely slow down performance if the index blocks are being recreated constantly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
1 months ago
I think Option A makes sense. It would make sense for the DML operations to recreate the bitmap index blocks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
1 months ago
Yeah, it seems like a logical explanation for the performance degradation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
1 months ago
I agree, constantly rebuilding the bitmap index blocks would definitely impact performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
2 months ago
I think Option A makes sense. The DML operations re-creating the bitmap index blocks would slow things down.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adelaide
2 months ago
But wouldn't the bitmap index being rebuilt automatically after a DML operation help improve performance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
2 months ago
I agree with Edmond, the constant recreation of bitmap index blocks can slow things down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
3 months ago
I think performance degrades because the DML operations re-create the bitmap index blocks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
3 months ago
Option C seems the most plausible to me. Locking an entire bitmap segment makes sense when dealing with DML operations.
upvoted 0 times
Ernie
2 months ago
I agree, locking a bitmap segment during DML operations seems logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
2 months ago
C) The smallest amount of a bitmap that can be locked is a bitmap segment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
2 months ago
A) The DML operations re-create the bitmap index blocks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77