New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-497 Topic 8 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-497 exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 8
[All 1Z0-497 Questions]

Why does performance degrade when many UPDATE, INSERT, or DELETEstatements are issued on a table that has an associated bitmap index?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Bitmap indexes in currently ''supported'' versions of Oracle are maintained in a much more efficient manner than they were previously, to the point where the need for frequently rebuilds has been much reduced, even in tables in which such indexes are not dropped during heavy loads.

That said, Bitmap indexes are still unsuitable in OLTP type environments (even in 11g or later) due to the locking implications associated with them.

Note: bitmap indexes are only suitable for static tables and materialized views which are updated at nigh and rebuilt after batch row loading.

Not B: Like b-tree indexes, bitmap indexes should be rebuilt (ALTER INDEX . . . REBUILD) if there is a lot of DML (UPDATE, INSERT, DELETE) activity.

Not A: Since 10g,Oracle issignificantly more efficient and where possible will simply adjust the current rowidrange of the Bitmap index entry and modify the bitmap string accordingly to accommodatea new row value (resulting in an overall increase of just 2 bytes overall in this example) rather than create a totally new index entry (which required an additional 21 bytes in the 9i example).


Contribute your Thoughts:

Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!


Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77