Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-519 Topic 12 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-519 exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 12
[All 1Z0-519 Questions]

XYZ Corp. has operations in the U.S. and Canad

a. Within Canada, it has two separate Divisions due to

Statutory requirements: one in Quebec and another in Ontario.

How would you define the organization structure for XYZ Corp. from the information given above?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Hubert
5 months ago
I agree with Jaime, A makes the most sense based on the information given.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
5 months ago
But the question mentioned two separate Divisions in Canada, so it should be A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
5 months ago
Wait, does XYZ Corp. stand for 'eXtra Complicated Yonder Conglomerate'? Seriously, this question is a headache.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
5 months ago
I'm going with E. Three of everything sounds like the kind of overengineered solution a big corporation would come up with.
upvoted 0 times
Thomasena
3 months ago
I see your point, but I still think E is the most likely choice for a large corporation like XYZ Corp.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
3 months ago
I agree, A seems like the most straightforward option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
3 months ago
I think E is too complex, I would go with A for a simpler structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
3 months ago
I see your point, but I still think E is the most likely choice given the complexity of the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
4 months ago
I agree with you, B also seems like a plausible option. It strikes a good balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
4 months ago
I think A makes more sense. Two of everything seems simpler and more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marguerita
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
5 months ago
Haha, this question is like a riddle! I bet the answer is C, just to keep us on our toes.
upvoted 0 times
Willard
4 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. But I still think it's C, with two Legal Entities and two Operating Units.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
5 months ago
I think the answer is actually D, with three Legal Entities and three Operating Units.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jaime
5 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
5 months ago
I'm not sure, this question seems a bit tricky. But I'm leaning towards D since the information mentions three legal entities (U.S., Quebec, and Ontario).
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
5 months ago
I think the answer is B. It makes sense that with two separate divisions in Canada, there would be two legal entities and three operating units (U.S., Quebec, and Ontario).
upvoted 0 times
Mary
4 months ago
So, the organization structure for XYZ Corp. would be two Ledgers, two Legal Entities, and three Operating Units.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
4 months ago
That makes sense, each division would need its own legal entity and operating unit.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
4 months ago
I agree, having two separate divisions in Canada would require two legal entities and three operating units.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
4 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77