Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-519 Topic 7 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-519 exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 7
[All 1Z0-519 Questions]

XYZ Corp. has operations in the U.S. and Canad

a. Within Canada, it has two separate Divisions due to

Statutory requirements: one in Quebec and another in Ontario.

How would you define the organization structure for XYZ Corp. from the information given above?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alpha
2 months ago
Option B, baby! Two Ledgers, two Legal Entities, and three Operating Units. Easy peasy lemon squeezy. Now, if only the exam question was as straightforward as a good old-fashioned Canadian maple syrup recipe, I'd be golden.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
2 months ago
I agree with Art, A makes sense based on the information given.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
2 months ago
But the question mentioned two separate Divisions in Canada, so it should be A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordie
2 months ago
Hmm, let me see... I think option B is the way to go. Two Ledgers, two Legal Entities, and three Operating Units. Yep, that's the one that makes the most sense to me. Hey, at least it's not as confusing as trying to figure out the Canadian tax system, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Rodney
27 days ago
Definitely, option B is the best fit for the organization structure of XYZ Corp. It's clear and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
29 days ago
Yeah, having two Ledgers, two Legal Entities, and three Operating Units makes sense based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
2 months ago
I agree with you, option B seems to be the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Britt
2 months ago
I'm going with C. Two Ledgers, three Legal Entities, and two Operating Units. I mean, come on, it's not rocket science. Or is it? *chuckles* Nah, just kidding. This is a piece of cake.
upvoted 0 times
Terry
1 months ago
I agree with you, C sounds right. Two Ledgers, three Legal Entities, and two Operating Units.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
1 months ago
I'm going with C. Two Ledgers, three Legal Entities, and two Operating Units. It just makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
2 months ago
No way, it's definitely B. Two Ledgers, two Legal Entities, and three Operating Units.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brigette
2 months ago
I think it's A. Two Ledgers, two Legal Entities, and two Operating Units.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Giovanna
2 months ago
Option D, definitely. Three Legal Entities - U.S., Quebec, and Ontario. That's what the question is asking for, right? I'm not trying to overthink this, just going with the plain ol' facts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lino
3 months ago
Hmm, I'd say option B. Two Ledgers for the U.S. and Canada, two Legal Entities for the divisions in Quebec and Ontario, and three Operating Units - one for the U.S. and two for Canada. Seems like the most logical choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
Mirta
2 months ago
Yeah, option B sounds like the best choice. It ensures that each division in Canada has its own legal entity and operating unit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
2 months ago
I agree, option B seems to fit the scenario well. It's important to have the right structure in place for each division.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
2 months ago
I think option B makes sense. It aligns with the information provided about the separate divisions in Quebec and Ontario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilda
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
3 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77