Oracle Exam 1Z0-519 Topic 9 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-519 exam

Question #: 61
Topic #: 9

Your customer completes four production orders on a daily basis. One of the production orders has quality problems on some finished-good items. The requirements for this situation are:

i) Isolate the defective material from the regular production order output.

ii) The system should prevent this material from being included in external customer order shipments.

What setup or process can achieve these objectives?

AEnable lot control for the item. Store the lot in an isolated subinventory.

BDefine the lot number as a rejected lot. Store this lot in an isolated subinventory.

CCreate a reject locator. Move the items to this locator that prevents customer shipment.

DEnable lot control for the item. Assign material status that disallows shipping transactions.

EEnable serial control for the item. Store the serial control item in s separate subinventory that prevents customer shipment.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Rozella at Apr 10, 2024, 05:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-519 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Cortney

6 months ago

I personally think option D) is the most reliable solution. By enabling lot control for the item and assigning a material status that disallows shipping transactions, we can ensure that the defective material does not reach the customers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonda

6 months ago

I see your points, but I think option C) could also work. Creating a reject locator and moving the items there can effectively prevent the defective material from being included in customer shipments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merrilee

6 months ago

I disagree. Option B) is a better solution. By defining the lot number as a rejected lot and storing it in an isolated subinventory, we can clearly identify and separate the defective material.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zita

6 months ago

I think option A) is the best choice. By enabling lot control and storing the defective material in an isolated subinventory, we can easily track and manage the defective items.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theola

7 months ago

I see the benefits of option B) Define the lot number as a rejected lot. Store this lot in an isolated subinventory. It seems like a good way to isolate defective material.

upvoted 0 times

...

Val

7 months ago

I personally think option C) Create a reject locator. Move the items to this locator that prevents customer shipment is the most practical solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Xochitl

7 months ago

I disagree, I believe option D) Enable lot control for the item. Assign material status that disallows shipping transactions is the better choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Irma

7 months ago

I think option A) Enable lot control for the item. Store the lot in an isolated subinventory would work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gracia

8 months ago

Exactly! And option E with the separate subinventory for serial control items? That's just overkill. We're trying to solve a quality issue, not play inventory Tetris.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lai

8 months ago

You got that right! I mean, 'define the lot number as a rejected lot'? What kind of mumbo-jumbo is that? If I saw that on the exam, I'd be like, 'Nice try, but no thanks!'

upvoted 0 times

Antonio

6 months ago

I agree with Mignon. It's important to prevent defective material from reaching customers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mignon

6 months ago

I prefer option D. Enabling lot control and assigning a material status that disallows shipping makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheridan

7 months ago

Yeah, that sounds like a practical solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenn

7 months ago

I think option A would work. Enable lot control and isolate the lot in a subinventory.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuki

8 months ago

Haha, convoluted? That's a nice way of putting it. Some of these options sound like they were designed by a prankster trying to trip us up!

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

8 months ago

Yeah, D is my pick too. It's a straightforward solution that directly addresses the requirements. Although, I have to say, the other options are a bit convoluted for my liking.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catalina

8 months ago

I agree, those three options seem the most promising. Personally, I'm leaning towards option D. Assigning a material status that disallows shipping transactions seems like the cleanest way to handle this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

France

8 months ago

This is a tricky question. The key is to isolate the defective material from the regular production order output and prevent it from being shipped to customers. I think options A, B, and D seem like the most viable solutions.

upvoted 0 times

...