Oracle Exam 1Z0-533 Topic 1 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-533 exam

Question #: 68
Topic #: 1

[All 1Z0-533 Questions]

Based on the following design:

Plan type 1: Summary Plan type with all Accounts by Entity

Plan type 2: Sales Plan type with Gales by Product by Entity

Plan type 3: Salary Plan type with Salary Expense by Employee by Entity

You need to get Sales data to the Summary plan type. Identify the two true statements about

sharing revenue data between the sales plan type and the summary plan type.

APlanning will build in @XREF calculations in a calc script by default to share data between plan
types.

BA replicated partition could be created to replicate data from the sales plan type to the summary
plan type and this would be done if we wanted to store the sales data in the summary plan type.

CA transparent partition and @XREF calculations could have performance issues for retrievals
because data is not stored; it is dynamically calculated.

DA calc export script on the source database with the DATAEXPORT command could be used I
export data out of the revenue plan type and calc import script on the target database with the
DATAIMPORT command could be used to import the data file to the summary plan type.

ETo disable the building of @XREF, update theHSPProperties file for the application before you
click Create during the application creation process.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, D

by Lakeesha at Jun 24, 2024, 11:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-533 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Billy

5 months ago

If the sales data is as slippery as a greased pig, option B might be the way to go. Gotta wrangle that revenue data one way or another!

upvoted 0 times

...

Elbert

5 months ago

I bet the person who wrote this question has a secret passion for origami. Folding those @XREF calculations must be a real art form.

upvoted 0 times

Glendora

3 months ago

C) A transparent partition and @XREF calculations could have performance issues for retrievals because data is not stored; it is dynamically calculated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Remona

3 months ago

B) A replicated partition could be created to replicate data from the sales plan type to the summary plan type and this would be done if we wanted to store the sales data in the summary plan type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlyne

3 months ago

A) Planning will build in @XREF calculations in a calc script by default to share data between plan types.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dan

4 months ago

C) A transparent partition and @XREF calculations could have performance issues for retrievals because data is not stored; it is dynamically calculated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mona

4 months ago

B) A replicated partition could be created to replicate data from the sales plan type to the summary plan type and this would be done if we wanted to store the sales data in the summary plan type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbye

4 months ago

A) Planning will build in @XREF calculations in a calc script by default to share data between plan types.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ahmed

5 months ago

I believe option D is also true. Using calc export and import scripts would be a practical way to transfer data between plan types.

upvoted 0 times

...

Belen

5 months ago

I'm not sure about option C. Using transparent partition and @XREF calculations may indeed have performance issues, but it's necessary for dynamic calculations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lottie

5 months ago

I agree with Ashlyn. Option B also seems valid as creating a replicated partition would be necessary to store sales data in the summary plan type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominga

5 months ago

Option C makes sense, but I wonder if the performance issues would be a dealbreaker in the real world. Gotta weigh the pros and cons, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Rolande

4 months ago

B) A replicated partition could be created to replicate data from the sales plan type to the summary plan type and this would be done if we wanted to store the sales data in the summary plan type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristin

4 months ago

C) A transparent partition and @XREF calculations could have performance issues for retrievals because data is not stored; it is dynamically calculated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hildred

5 months ago

Option D looks like a lot of work - exporting and importing data files manually? Ain't nobody got time for that!

upvoted 0 times

...

Gracia

5 months ago

I'm not sure about option E. Disabling @XREF during application creation seems like it could have unintended consequences. Better to use a solution that doesn't require modifying the application properties.

upvoted 0 times

Gene

4 months ago

That could work too, but it might be more complex compared to using a replicated partition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonna

4 months ago

But what about using a calc export script to export data from the revenue plan type?

upvoted 0 times

...

Salina

4 months ago

I agree, using a replicated partition seems like a safer option than modifying application properties.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nieves

5 months ago

Option B sounds like a good solution to replicate data from sales to summary plan type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlyn

5 months ago

I think option A is true because @XREF calculations are commonly used for sharing data between plan types.

upvoted 0 times

...

Abraham

6 months ago

Option B seems like the most straightforward approach. Replicating the data from the sales plan type to the summary plan type would ensure the data is stored and readily accessible.

upvoted 0 times

Daniel

5 months ago

I agree, using a replicated partition makes it easier to manage and access the sales data in the summary plan type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Asha

5 months ago

Option B is definitely a good choice. It simplifies the process of sharing data between plan types.

upvoted 0 times

...