Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-533 Topic 10 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-533 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 10
[All 1Z0-533 Questions]

What are the two possible effects on the database when the data storage property of a parent

member in the sparse Entity dimension is set to Dynamic Calc?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ronald
3 months ago
That's a good point, Kaycee. It could be one of the effects too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
3 months ago
But wouldn't decreasing the Essbase data block size be a possible effect as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
3 months ago
I agree with Ronald, it makes sense that referencing the parent entity member could be slower.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
3 months ago
I think setting the data storage property to Dynamic Calc could slow down retrieval performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
3 months ago
Option C is the correct answer. Dynamic Calc can cause performance issues, especially when dealing with complex hierarchies. Essbase, you so crazy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
3 months ago
This question is making my head spin! Dynamic Calc is like a black box - you never know what it's going to do. I'll just guess C and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
4 months ago
That's a good point, it could have multiple effects on the database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maricela
4 months ago
A sounds wrong to me. Essbase data block size shouldn't be affected by the data storage property of a parent member. I'd go with C as the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
Patria
2 months ago
Yeah, C makes the most sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
2 months ago
I think C is the most logical option as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
3 months ago
I agree, A does sound incorrect. C seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tina
4 months ago
But wouldn't the data block size decrease as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
4 months ago
B and D seem plausible, but I'm not entirely sure. Dynamic Calc can have some unexpected effects on the database, so I'd need to double-check the documentation to be certain.
upvoted 0 times
Odette
3 months ago
Definitely, it's important to fully understand the potential impacts before making changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
3 months ago
I agree, it's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to database configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
3 months ago
It's always a good idea to double-check the documentation to be certain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
3 months ago
I think B and D are correct. Dynamic Calc can have some unexpected effects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jina
4 months ago
I agree with Jeniffer, retrieval performance could be affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. Retrieval performance could be slower when referencing the parent entity member. Dynamic Calc can impact performance, especially for complex calculations.
upvoted 0 times
Royal
3 months ago
I think it could also be D. Data input might be restricted for the parent member in target versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
4 months ago
I agree, C seems like the correct answer. Dynamic Calc can slow down retrieval performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeniffer
4 months ago
I think setting the data storage property to Dynamic Calc could make retrieval slower.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77