Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Oracle Exam 1Z0-533 Topic 2 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-533 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 2
[All 1Z0-533 Questions]

You are designing a new Planning application. Which two requirements dictate multiple plan types

in a single Planning application?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, E

by Glenn at Apr 12, 2024, 07:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-533 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Buck
5 months ago
That's a good point, Shawnda. It's important to consider the different functionalities that each module brings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
5 months ago
I believe requirement E is also a valid reason for multiple plan types. Implementing different modules might require separate plans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
5 months ago
I agree with Buck. Planning by product and channel, as well as different security settings for accounts makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
6 months ago
I think requirement C and D dictate multiple plan types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
6 months ago
That's a good point, David. Multiple plan types should be based on specific planning requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
6 months ago
I think option F is not relevant, as data sharing across dimensions should not dictate plan types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
6 months ago
Yes, implementing a new planning module would require separate plan types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
6 months ago
I believe requirement E also justifies having multiple plan types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
7 months ago
I agree, planning by different categories definitely calls for multiple plan types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
7 months ago
I think requirement C is important for multiple plan types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
8 months ago
Ooh, good catch! D is a solid option too. The need for different security permissions across plan types is a great example of a requirement driving multiple plan types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
8 months ago
What about D? Security applied differently for 'sales' and 'expenses' accounts could definitely necessitate separate plan types, no?
upvoted 0 times
...
Martha
8 months ago
Yeah, I'm with you on that. E feels like more of a 'nice to have' rather than a core requirement. I'd go with C as one of the answers, but I'm still trying to figure out the second one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
8 months ago
Hmm, C makes sense because you'd want to plan sales and salary expenses separately. But E? I'm not sure about that one. Implementing a Capital Expense module seems more like an additional feature than a requirement for multiple plan types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
8 months ago
I agree, this is definitely testing our knowledge of planning application design. From the options provided, I think C and E are the two correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
8 months ago
I think this question is trying to test our understanding of the requirements that would drive the need for multiple plan types in a single planning application. The key seems to be identifying those requirements that would necessitate separate planning processes or data structures.
upvoted 0 times
Vonda
7 months ago
A) Multiple currencies are required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
7 months ago
C) Sales are planned by product and channel, and salary expenses are planned by position.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77