Oracle Exam 1Z0-588 Topic 4 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-588 exam

Question #: 81
Topic #: 4

Identify the four true statements about designing property categories, property definitions, and validations for target and source systems.

AAllow users to type in property values for properties that only have a limited set of valid values.

BCreate derived property definitions that are hidden from users that can be used in exports for target systems.

CCreate separate property categories for each target and source system.

DName property definitions different then target system names.

ECreate similar validations that are used by source systems.

FCreate similar validations that are used by target systems.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, C, D, E

by Emelda at Sep 14, 2024, 07:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-588 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Rosalind

1 months ago

This is a real head-scratcher. I'm going to go with B, E, and F. Consistency in validations is key, but I'm not sure about creating similar ones for source and target systems.

upvoted 0 times

Ria

5 days ago

Definitely, having consistent property definitions and validations is crucial for smooth data integration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lettie

10 days ago

Creating similar validations for both source and target systems can help ensure data integrity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anglea

14 days ago

I agree, consistency is key. That's why I would go with E and F as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doug

21 days ago

I think B is a good choice. It's important to have derived property definitions for exports.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruthann

2 months ago

Did anyone else notice the typo in option D? It's 'than', not 'then'. Anyway, I'm going with B, C, and F. Gotta love those hidden properties!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashley

2 months ago

I'm just going to go with my gut on this one: A, B, and F. Typing in limited values sounds like a bad idea, but the other two are solid.

upvoted 0 times

...

Remona

2 months ago

Hold up, are we sure 'then' is supposed to be 'than' in option D? Anyway, I'm leaning towards B, C, and F. Gotta love those hidden derived properties!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lanie

2 months ago

Is this a trick question? I'd say B, D, and F are the right choices. Naming things differently than the target system seems counterinductive.

upvoted 0 times

Janae

26 days ago

Definitely, it helps in maintaining data integrity across systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherry

1 months ago

Creating derived property definitions for exports is also a good practice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noel

1 months ago

I agree, it's important to have consistency in naming property definitions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosio

1 months ago

I think B, D, and F are correct. Naming things differently doesn't make sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Franklyn

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm going to go with C, E, and F. Separating property categories for each system is crucial, and consistency in validations is key.

upvoted 0 times

Raul

1 months ago

F) Create similar validations that are used by target systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laura

2 months ago

E) Create similar validations that are used by source systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chantay

2 months ago

C) Create separate property categories for each target and source system.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ira

3 months ago

I believe option F is true because having similar validations for target systems is important.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nicolette

3 months ago

I agree with that. Option B also seems true as it mentions hidden derived property definitions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marnie

3 months ago

Wow, this is a tricky one. I'm going with A, B, and F. Allowing users to type in limited values sounds like a bad idea, but the other two seem spot on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nettie

3 months ago

I think B, C, and F are the correct statements. Hiding derived properties from users and creating similar validations for target systems makes a lot of sense.

upvoted 0 times