Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-829 Topic 3 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-829 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 3
[All 1Z0-829 Questions]

Given:

Which statement is true while the program prints GC?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ryann
4 months ago
I'm going with D. Only one of the t1 objects is getting the boot, while the other one's probably sitting there, sipping coffee and reading the newspaper. Java, you so crazy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jame
4 months ago
I think the answer is C) None of the objects are eligible for garbage collection because there are still references to them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
5 months ago
Gotta be C, right? I mean, if the program is printing 'GC', that must mean the garbage collector is running, but not actually collecting anything. Classic Java move.
upvoted 0 times
Dorathy
3 months ago
I see your point, it does seem like a Java trick. 'GC' could just be a signal that the garbage collector is being called, not actually collecting anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
4 months ago
I agree, it seems like a trick question. 'GC' doesn't necessarily mean objects are being collected, just that the garbage collector is running.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
4 months ago
Yeah, I think you're right. 'GC' probably just means the garbage collector is being invoked, but not necessarily collecting anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickolas
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be B) Both the objects previously referenced by t1 are eligible for garbage collection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Only one of the objects previously referenced by t1 is eligible for garbage collection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
5 months ago
I think the answer is A) Only the object referenced by t2 is eligible for garbage collection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
5 months ago
Hmm, this one's tricky. I'd say B, because clearly both t1 references are gone, so they should be eligible for collection. But who knows, Java can be a real mystery sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
Roy
4 months ago
Yeah, Java can be unpredictable sometimes, but I agree with you on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carli
4 months ago
Yeah, Java can be unpredictable sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
4 months ago
I think you're right, both t1 references are gone so they should be eligible for collection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
4 months ago
Good point, so maybe it's D then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
5 months ago
But what about t2? Only one object is eligible for collection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
5 months ago
I think it's B too, both t1 references are gone.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77