Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-829 Topic 9 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-829 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 9
[All 1Z0-829 Questions]

Given the code fragment:

Which action enables the code to compile?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The code fragment compares four pairs of strings using the equals() and intern() methods. The equals() method compares the content of two strings, while the intern() method returns a canonical representation of a string, which means that it returns a reference to an existing string with the same content in the string pool. The string pool is a memory area where strings are stored and reused to save space and improve performance. The results of the comparisons are as follows:

s1.equals(s2): This returns true because both s1 and s2 have the same content, ''Hello Java 17''.

s1 == s2: This returns false because s1 and s2 are different objects with different references, even though they have the same content. The == operator compares the references of two objects, not their content.

s1.intern() == s2.intern(): This returns true because both s1.intern() and s2.intern() return a reference to the same string object in the string pool, which has the content ''Hello Java 17''. The intern() method ensures that there is only one copy of each distinct string value in the string pool.

''Hello Java 17'' == s2: This returns false because ''Hello Java 17'' is a string literal, which is automatically interned and stored in the string pool, while s2 is a string object created with the new operator, which is not interned by default and stored in the heap. Therefore, they have different references and are not equal using the == operator.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Tu
2 months ago
B) Remove the regNO initialization statement. Duh, it's the only option that actually addresses the compile error. Some of these answers are just plain silly.
upvoted 0 times
Sharan
19 days ago
C) Make the regNo variable static.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
21 days ago
B) Remove the regNO initialization statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
25 days ago
A) Replace record with void.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bea
2 months ago
Haha, E) Make the regNo variable public? That's just asking for trouble! Encapsulation, people, encapsulation!
upvoted 0 times
Catarina
1 months ago
User1: B) Remove the regNO initialization statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
1 months ago
User2: User1, that won't enable the code to compile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
2 months ago
User1: A) Replace record with void.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Novella
2 months ago
I think D) Replace the regNo variable with static is the way to go. Making it static will allow the variable to be accessed without creating an instance of the class.
upvoted 0 times
William
21 days ago
I agree, making it static would make the variable accessible without an instance of the class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
1 months ago
I believe making it static is the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
1 months ago
But wouldn't making the regNo variable public also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Celia
2 months ago
I think D) Replace the regNo variable with static is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonida
2 months ago
The correct answer is B) Remove the regNO initialization statement. The code snippet has a compile error because the record type does not have a default constructor, so initializing regNo within the declaration is not allowed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
3 months ago
But making the variable static will allow it to be accessed without an instance of the class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Replace the regNo variable static.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is C) Make the regNo variable static.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77