Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-888 Topic 12 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-888 exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 12
[All 1Z0-888 Questions]

You have created a backup of the 'sales' database with the command:

Which two procedures can be used to restore the 'orders' table from the backup?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Antonette
5 months ago
Option C is pretty funny. Comparing the rate of selects versus scans? That's like asking a chef to compare the rate of knife usage to the rate of oven usage.
upvoted 0 times
Jesusa
4 months ago
C) Check the rate of change in the status value Select_scan and compare to the rate of change in Com_select.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
4 months ago
B) Check the difference between the InnoDB status values ''Log Sequence number'' and ''Last Checkpoint'' positions then compare that to the total size of the redo log.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
4 months ago
A) Check the rate of change in the status value Aborted_connects and compare to the rate of change in Connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
4 months ago
C) Check the rate of change in the status value Select_scan and compare to the rate of change in Com_select.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
4 months ago
B) Check the difference between the InnoDB status values ''Log Sequence number'' and ''Last Checkpoint'' positions then compare that to the total size of the redo log.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
4 months ago
A) Check the rate of change in the status value Aborted_connects and compare to the rate of change in Connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Celestina
5 months ago
Ha! This is a classic DBA question. I'd go with Option A - monitoring the connection status is always a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
Levi
4 months ago
Definitely, it's important to keep an eye on Aborted_connects and Connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
5 months ago
I agree, monitoring the connection status is crucial for database restoration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emogene
5 months ago
I think option E is the correct procedure because it involves checking the rate of change in specific status values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
5 months ago
But option B makes more sense because it involves checking the InnoDB status values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
5 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think Option E might be the best choice. Monitoring the cache hit ratio could provide valuable information about the database's performance.
upvoted 0 times
Johnson
4 months ago
You make a good point. Option E seems like the most straightforward choice for restoring the 'orders' table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
5 months ago
I see your point, but I believe Option D could also be useful. Comparing the InnoDB status values might give us important insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
5 months ago
I think Option B might also be a good choice. Checking the InnoDB status values could help with the restore process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
5 months ago
I agree, monitoring the cache hit ratio is crucial for database performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Callie
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the best way to restore the table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Comparing the transaction ID counter to the purge status can give insights into the state of the database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
5 months ago
I think option B is the correct procedure to restore the 'orders' table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
5 months ago
Option B seems the most relevant. Checking the difference between the InnoDB log sequence number and last checkpoint positions can help determine if the backup is consistent.
upvoted 0 times
Almeta
4 months ago
Yes, it's important to check the consistency of the backup by comparing the log sequence number and last checkpoint positions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
5 months ago
I agree, option B is the best choice for restoring the 'orders' table.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77