Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Oracle Exam 1Z0-900 Topic 1 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-900 exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 1
[All 1Z0-900 Questions]

Given:

Which annotation do you use on line 1 to ensure that clients immediately time out when attempting to concurrently invoke callMethod () while another client is already accessing the bean?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Rodrigo at Aug 28, 2024, 10:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-900 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lacresha
2 months ago
I'm just here for the memes, not the actual exam questions. But if I had to guess, I'd say A. Anything with 'timeout' in the name sounds like the right choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
2 months ago
Wait, wait, wait... Didn't we just learn about these in class? I think A is the correct answer, but I can't remember why. Ugh, this exam is making my brain hurt!
upvoted 0 times
Vanda
26 days ago
Selma: Oh right, thanks for clarifying. A it is then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tesha
29 days ago
User 3: No, it's definitely A. It's about timing out when clients try to access concurrently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
1 months ago
User 2: Are you sure? I think it might be C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
1 months ago
Yeah, I remember this one. A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reena
2 months ago
I believe setting a timeout of 0 with option D) @AccessTimeout (0) would make the method immediately return if another client is accessing the bean.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option B) @AccessTimeout (null) might also work to prevent concurrent invocations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
3 months ago
C. @AccessTimeout (-1) is the way to go. Negative values mean no timeout, so the bean will be locked until it's available. Genius!
upvoted 0 times
Rolf
2 months ago
Genius! That's really helpful to know.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
2 months ago
Yeah, negative values mean no timeout, so the bean will be locked until it's available.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
2 months ago
I think @AccessTimeout (-1) is the correct annotation to use.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marci
3 months ago
I agree with Flo, setting a timeout of 1 second seems reasonable to prevent concurrent access issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
3 months ago
D. @AccessTimeout (0) sounds like the best option to me. Zero means no timeout at all, so clients can keep trying indefinitely. Gotta keep those connections open!
upvoted 0 times
Asha
1 months ago
D) @AccessTimeout (0) may not be the most suitable option for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
1 months ago
C) @AccessTimeout (-1) would not ensure clients immediately time out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
2 months ago
B) @AccessTimeout (null) is not the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
2 months ago
A) @AccessTimeout (value = 1, unit = TimeUnit.SECONDS) is the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gaynell
3 months ago
Hmm, I think B. @AccessTimeout (null) is the way to go. Null means no timeout, right? Let's keep it simple!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
3 months ago
The correct answer is A. @AccessTimeout (value = 1, unit = TimeUnit.SECONDS) ensures that clients time out immediately when attempting to concurrently invoke callMethod() while another client is already accessing the bean.
upvoted 0 times
King
3 months ago
Yes, you are correct. That annotation ensures immediate timeout for clients trying to access the bean concurrently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ines
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) @AccessTimeout (value = 1, unit = TimeUnit.SECONDS)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Flo
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is A) @AccessTimeout (value = 1, unit = TimeUnit.SECONDS)
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77