Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OutSystems Exam Associate-Reactive-Developer Topic 2 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for OutSystems's Associate-Reactive-Developer exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 2
[All Associate-Reactive-Developer Questions]

Regarding a Consumer module ...

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carlton
5 months ago
Reusing anything and everything? Sounds like a recipe for a spaghetti code nightmare. I'll stick with B.
upvoted 0 times
Maile
3 months ago
Yeah, sticking with option B sounds like a good idea to maintain code clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
3 months ago
I think it's important to have some restrictions on what can be reused to avoid confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
3 months ago
I agree, reusing only public elements seems like a safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
3 months ago
I prefer B as well, it helps maintain a cleaner and more organized codebase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
4 months ago
I think C would provide more flexibility in reusing elements from different modules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
4 months ago
I agree, sticking with B ensures better control over what elements are being reused.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emily
5 months ago
I think the answer is A, because it makes sense for the Consumer module to only reuse elements that are Public in their Producer modules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
5 months ago
Haha, D is the obvious choice here. We all know Consumers have to poach elements from other apps to get anything done!
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
5 months ago
I'm going with B. Keeping things encapsulated and controlled is important in software design, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
Lashonda
4 months ago
I think B is the best option too. It helps with encapsulation and organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
4 months ago
Yes, I agree. It's important to maintain control over what elements can be reused.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aja
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
5 months ago
C definitely seems like the most comprehensive answer to me. Why would we limit ourselves to just one application?
upvoted 0 times
Tegan
4 months ago
D) It can only reuse elements from Producer modules of other applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
4 months ago
C) It can reuse any element from any Producer module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
4 months ago
B) It can only reuse elements that are Public in their Producer modules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marla
5 months ago
A) It can only reuse elements from Producer modules of the same application.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annelle
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. I'm leaning towards C. It can reuse any element from any Producer module.
upvoted 0 times
Marla
4 months ago
I agree with you, I also think it's B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
5 months ago
I think it's B. It can only reuse elements that are Public in their Producer modules.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amalia
5 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
6 months ago
I think the correct answer is B. It can only reuse elements that are Public in their Producer modules.
upvoted 0 times
Krystal
5 months ago
I agree, the Consumer module can only reuse elements that are Public in their Producer modules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
5 months ago
I think the correct answer is B. It can only reuse elements that are Public in their Producer modules.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77