Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

OutSystems Exam Associate-Reactive-Developer Topic 2 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for OutSystems's Associate-Reactive-Developer exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 2
[All Associate-Reactive-Developer Questions]

Regarding a Consumer module ...

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Arletta
4 months ago
Option C is the way to go! It's like a buffet of reusable elements. Just don't forget to bring your appetite (and your bug spray).
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
4 months ago
I'd pick Option B. Anything less would be like trying to read the producer's mind. No thank you, I'll stick to the public stuff.
upvoted 0 times
Xuan
3 months ago
Delisa: Exactly, why make things more complicated than they need to be?
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
3 months ago
Yeah, I think sticking to the public elements is the way to go. It's more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charolette
3 months ago
I agree, Option B is the safest choice. No need to overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
4 months ago
Yeah, sticking to the public elements is much safer and easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
4 months ago
I agree, Option B is the way to go. No need to overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeffrey
4 months ago
Option A is just too restrictive. We're not living in the stone age, people! Let's go with C and live on the edge.
upvoted 0 times
Gwenn
3 months ago
Let's go with option C and live on the edge! It's the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
3 months ago
Yeah, option C gives us more freedom to reuse elements from any module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
3 months ago
I think option C is the way to go too. We need that flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
4 months ago
I agree, option A is too limiting. We should definitely go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Afton
5 months ago
Hmm, Option D sounds fishy. Why would we want to reuse elements from other applications? Seems like a security risk to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
5 months ago
I think the answer is A, because it makes sense for Consumer modules to only reuse Public elements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
5 months ago
I'm going with Option C. Who doesn't love the freedom to reuse anything from any Producer module? Woohoo!
upvoted 0 times
Yolando
4 months ago
Option C definitely gives us more flexibility in the Consumer module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
4 months ago
Yeah, it's great to have the freedom to reuse any element.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catrice
4 months ago
I agree, option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Samira
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
5 months ago
Option B seems logical, as it makes sense to only reuse public elements from Producer modules.
upvoted 0 times
Rebecka
5 months ago
Yes, that way we can ensure consistency and avoid any potential conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
5 months ago
I agree, option B does seem logical. It's important to only reuse public elements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephen
5 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77