Hmm, good point, Mattie. Option D, testing and deploying patches on a focused set of systems, could be a safer way to go. That way we can make sure the patches work before rolling them out across the board.
Hold up, you two. Option C, performing an attack on local systems? That's a bold move, but I'm not sure I'm comfortable intentionally compromising our own systems, even for testing purposes.
Yeah, I agree with Tawna. Patching is key, but we can't forget about preventative techniques too. Option B looks promising to me - creating memory-corruption techniques could really beef up our security.
Oof, this question is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option A - patching systems and software continuously. It's the most straightforward way to eliminate known vulnerabilities, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Curt
6 months agoMattie
6 months agoJusta
6 months agoCarma
6 months agoPhuong
6 months agoCasie
6 months agoCasie
6 months agoJudy
6 months agoShawnna
6 months agoFrancis
6 months agoTawna
6 months ago