Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCCSE Topic 5 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCCSE exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 5
[All PCCSE Questions]

Which of the following is a reason for alert dismissal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/prisma/prisma-cloud/prisma-cloud-admin/manage-prisma-cloud-alerts/prisma-cloud-alert-resolution-reasons

In Prisma Cloud,POLICY_UPDATEDis a valid reason for the dismissal of an alert. This reason indicates that an alert can be dismissed if the policy that triggered the alert has been updated. When a policy is updated to no longer apply to certain resources or conditions, any open alerts that were generated based on the previous version of the policy may be dismissed as they are no longer relevant.

The other options, such as SNOOZED_AUTO_CLOSE, ALERT_RULE_ADDED, and USER_DELETED, are not standard reasons for the dismissal of an alert in Prisma Cloud. SNOOZED_AUTO_CLOSE refers to the temporary suspension of an alert, ALERT_RULE_ADDED is related to the creation of a new alert rule, and USER_DELETED would pertain to the removal of a user account, not directly to alert dismissal.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Scot
2 months ago
A) SNOOZED_AUTO_CLOSE, for sure. Although, I'm kind of curious what would happen if you tried to dismiss an alert by deleting the user. 'Sorry, can't see that alert anymore, I'm not here!'
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
2 months ago
C) POLICY_UPDATED? What, the policy updated itself and the alert just disappeared? I don't think so.
upvoted 0 times
Viva
7 days ago
C) POLICY_UPDATED
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
7 days ago
D) USER_DELETED
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
29 days ago
B) ALERT_RULE_ADDED
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
1 months ago
A) SNOOZED_AUTO_CLOSE
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emile
2 months ago
B) ALERT_RULE_ADDED? That's just adding an alert, not dismissing one. Come on, people!
upvoted 0 times
Lauran
18 days ago
C) POLICY_UPDATED
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
19 days ago
B) ALERT_RULE_ADDED
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
25 days ago
A) SNOOZED_AUTO_CLOSE
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lauran
2 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. It depends on the specific situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it could be POLICY_UPDATED.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
2 months ago
I think the reason for alert dismissal could be SNOOZED_AUTO_CLOSE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
2 months ago
I'm going with D) USER_DELETED. I mean, if the user is gone, the alert is gone too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
3 months ago
Hmm, I think the correct answer is A) SNOOZED_AUTO_CLOSE. It just makes sense, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Kimbery
2 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's D) USER_DELETED, but now I'm second-guessing myself after hearing your reasoning for A) SNOOZED_AUTO_CLOSE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
2 months ago
I think it's C) POLICY_UPDATED, but I see your point about A) SNOOZED_AUTO_CLOSE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
2 months ago
I agree, A) SNOOZED_AUTO_CLOSE seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77