Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCNSC Topic 4 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's Palo Alto Networks Certified Network Security Consultant exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 4
[All Palo Alto Networks Certified Network Security Consultant Questions]

Which three user authentication services can be modified in to provide the Palo Alto Networks NGFW with both username and role names? (Choose three.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Elza
6 months ago
Good point, Ezekiel. I think RADIUS might not be the best option here. LDAP, on the other hand, seems like a more likely candidate since it can store user roles and attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about RADIUS. Isn't that usually just for basic username and password authentication? I wonder if it can handle the role name as well.
upvoted 0 times
Catarina
6 months ago
So, the three user authentication services that can be modified to provide username and role names are RADIUS, LDAP, and TACACS+.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
6 months ago
No, PAP cannot support both username and role names.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anna
6 months ago
I'm not sure about PAP, do you think it can handle both username and role names?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
6 months ago
Yes, TACACS+ is another user authentication service that can provide both username and role names.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
6 months ago
What about TACACS+? Can it support both username and role names?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
6 months ago
I think LDAP is another option that can provide both username and role names.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
6 months ago
Yes, RADIUS can provide both username and role names.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anastacia
6 months ago
I agree. We need to carefully consider which services can provide both username and role names, as that's the key requirement here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janet
6 months ago
This question seems to be testing our knowledge of different user authentication services and their compatibility with Palo Alto Networks NGFW. I think it's important to understand the capabilities and limitations of each service.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77