Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCNSE Topic 11 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCNSE exam
Question #: 101
Topic #: 11
[All PCNSE Questions]

A threat intelligence team has requested more than a dozen Short signatures to be deployed on all perimeter Palo Alto Networks firewalls. How does the firewall engineer fulfill this request with the least time to implement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rupert
2 months ago
Why don't we just use the firewall to launch the signatures directly at the threats? Efficiency through aggression!
upvoted 0 times
Rosendo
8 days ago
D: Let's go with option A for the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
9 days ago
C: Using Panorama IPs Signature Converter could also be a quick way to deploy the signatures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
20 days ago
B: That sounds like a good idea, it would definitely save time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
22 days ago
A: We can use Expedition to create custom signatures and push them to all firewalls using Panorama.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pamella
2 months ago
I'd just throw the whole firewall out the window and call it a day. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
2 months ago
I don't know, manually creating them on one firewall and then exporting sounds like a real pain. C is the way to go for sure.
upvoted 0 times
Kandis
1 months ago
That's a good point, using Panorama IPs Signature Converter seems like the most efficient way to deploy the signatures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
1 months ago
C) Use Panorama IPs Signature Converter to create custom vulnerability signatures, and push them to the firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
1 months ago
A) Use Expedition to create custom vulnerability signatures, deploy them to Panorama using API and push them to the firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nada
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Creating custom signatures manually on Panorama seems like it could take a lot of time. C might be the better option here.
upvoted 0 times
Renea
28 days ago
User 3: I'm not sure, but C could also work. Using Panorama IPs Signature Converter seems like a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
2 months ago
I agree with Nathan. A sounds like the most efficient way to fulfill the request.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
2 months ago
I think A is the best option. Using Expedition to create custom signatures will save time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jennifer
2 months ago
I agree, C is the best choice. Pushing the signatures directly from Panorama is the quickest and most streamlined method.
upvoted 0 times
Ryann
2 months ago
I agree, C is the best choice. Pushing the signatures directly from Panorama is the quickest and most streamlined method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
2 months ago
C) Use Panorama IPs Signature Converter to create custom vulnerability signatures, and push them to the firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
2 months ago
A) Use Expedition to create custom vulnerability signatures, deploy them to Panorama using API and push them to the firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charlene
3 months ago
I prefer option C, using Panorama IPs Signature Converter seems more efficient to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
3 months ago
I agree with Lenora, using Expedition and API will save a lot of time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
3 months ago
Option C seems the most efficient approach here. Using Panorama to convert and deploy the signatures is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Frederic
3 months ago
Definitely, it's the most efficient way to fulfill the request from the threat intelligence team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
3 months ago
I agree, using Panorama to convert and deploy the signatures will save a lot of time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenora
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice for fulfilling the request quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77