Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PCNSE Topic 4 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PCNSE exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 4
[All PCNSE Questions]

A firewall engineer needs to patch the company's Palo Alto Network firewalls to the latest version of PAN-OS. The company manages its firewalls by using panoram

a. Logs are forwarded to Dedicated Log Collectors, and file samples are forwarded to WildFire appliances for analysis. What must the engineer consider when planning deployment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Valentine
2 months ago
Option B is the way to go, no doubt about it. Patching all the components at once is like putting on a fresh coat of paint - you want everything to match and look sharp. Anything less would be a firewall faux pas!
upvoted 0 times
Elden
23 days ago
Patching everything at once is like a well-coordinated dance, everything moves together seamlessly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
24 days ago
I agree, it's like making sure all your tools are sharp before starting a project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
1 months ago
Option B is definitely the best choice. Keeping all components up to date is crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laurel
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think only Panorama needs to be patched first. Can someone explain why all components need to be updated together?
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
2 months ago
I'm going to have to go with option B. It's always better to be safe than sorry when it comes to patching critical network devices. Plus, who wants to be the one to explain to the boss why the firewalls are down?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
2 months ago
Option B seems logical to me. Gotta make sure all the pieces of the puzzle are in place before you start tinkering with the firewalls. Otherwise, you might end up with a real mess on your hands.
upvoted 0 times
German
1 months ago
Andree: Absolutely, it's always best to be thorough with these updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
1 months ago
Definitely, better safe than sorry when it comes to security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
1 months ago
Yeah, you don't want to miss any steps when updating those firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
1 months ago
I agree, option B sounds like the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amira
2 months ago
I think we should patch Panorama, Dedicated Log Collectors, and WildFire appliances before updating the firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
2 months ago
I agree with Amira. It's important to have all components on the same PAN-OS version for compatibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I was thinking option C might be the way to go, but I could be wrong. Someone call the IT guy, he'll know what to do!
upvoted 0 times
Rhea
2 months ago
Yeah, let's get the IT guy involved to ensure we follow the correct procedure for patching the firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
2 months ago
I'm not sure, maybe we should consult the IT guy to get a clear answer on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
2 months ago
I agree, it's important to make sure all components are on the same version to avoid any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
2 months ago
I think option B is the correct choice. Everything needs to be patched before updating the firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erick
3 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. All the components in the network must be on the same version of PAN-OS before the firewalls are updated.
upvoted 0 times
Ciara
2 months ago
Yes, that's correct. It ensures a smooth update process and reduces the risk of any issues arising.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
2 months ago
I agree, option B is the best choice. It's important for all components to be on the same version for compatibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77