Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Endpoint Topic 1 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Endpoint exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 1
[All PSE-Endpoint Questions]

A large manufacturer is planning to roll out Traps to 75,000 endpoints. Their environment consists of three major sites with 24,000 endpoints each, plus about 3,000 remote endpoints in smaller remote locations using always-on VPN connections to a single one of the major sites. The customer wants to minimize network traffic between the major sites, but all endpoints have internet access. The customer is looking for a centrally managed solution with common reporting and management for all endpoints in the environment.

Which design option would be appropriate for this environment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alex
2 months ago
I see both points, but I think option B might be the most cost-effective solution. Placing everything in a public-cloud environment accessible from the internet could provide the centralized management the customer is looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
2 months ago
C looks like it would work, but having a database and console in each site seems a bit overkill. D seems like a good middle ground.
upvoted 0 times
Stephaine
1 months ago
Yeah, D seems like a good balance between having everything in one place and spreading it out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
2 months ago
C sounds like it might be too much, D seems like a good compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
2 months ago
D) Place the Traps database and ESM Console in one of the major sites, and one ESM core server in each of the three major sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
2 months ago
C) Place a Traps database, ESM Console and an ESM core server in each of the three large sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Howard
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the IT team is just hoping nobody picks option A and forces everyone to use the VPN all the time. That would be a nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
1 months ago
Yeah, option C seems like a more practical solution for their environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
2 months ago
I agree, forcing everyone to use VPN all the time would definitely cause some headaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
2 months ago
Option A sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. I hope they go with a different choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
German
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more efficient. Placing the Traps database and ESM Console in one major site, and one ESM core server in each major site makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
3 months ago
B is an interesting cloud-based approach, but I'm not sure I'm comfortable with the ESM cores being accessible from the internet. That could open up some security concerns.
upvoted 0 times
Alease
1 months ago
Definitely, it's important to find a solution that balances security and efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
2 months ago
That makes sense, having a server in each major site would help with minimizing network traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
2 months ago
I think option C would be a good compromise, with a server in each major site.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
2 months ago
I agree, security should be the top priority in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Avery
3 months ago
I think option C would be best, with a Traps database, ESM Console, and ESM core server in each of the three large sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
3 months ago
Option D seems like the most logical choice. Centralizing the database and console while distributing the core servers makes sense to reduce network traffic between sites.
upvoted 0 times
Cassie
2 months ago
I agree, it would help in reducing network traffic between the major sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
2 months ago
Option D seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77