Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Endpoint Topic 2 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Endpoint exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 2
[All PSE-Endpoint Questions]

An Administrator has identified an EPM-triggered false positive and has used the Create Rule button from within the relevant entry in the Security Events > Preventions > Exploits tab. What is the result of the created rule?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jacquline
4 months ago
D is definitely the way to go. Precision is key when dealing with these security events. Don't want to be overzealous, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
4 months ago
I'm going with B. Seems like the most targeted approach to address the false positive.
upvoted 0 times
Tamar
3 months ago
Definitely, it's important to have specific rules in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
4 months ago
That's true, it's a targeted approach to address the false positive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
4 months ago
Agreed, it focuses on stopping EPM injection into processes on the specific machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
4 months ago
I think B is the best option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chaya
5 months ago
I agree with Angella, option D provides more information for better tracking and management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
5 months ago
But option D mentions including specific details which seems more comprehensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe it is option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
5 months ago
I think the result of the created rule is option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
5 months ago
D makes the most sense to me. Gotta love all the details in that rule, right? Bet the security team is thrilled about that.
upvoted 0 times
Ceola
4 months ago
Yeah, having all those details in the rule definitely helps the security team in understanding and managing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
4 months ago
D) The new rule will include the EPM that raised the prevention, the process that triggered the prevention, the machine on which the prevention was triggered, and a descriptive name for the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
4 months ago
B) The new rule stops all EPM injection into processes on the machine on which the prevention was triggered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
5 months ago
A) The new rule stops all EPM injection into the faulted process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Farrah
6 months ago
Hmm, I think the correct answer is D. The rule should capture the details of the prevention, not just stop EPM injection in a broad way.
upvoted 0 times
Felicitas
5 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to have all that information in the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
5 months ago
I think the answer is D. It captures all the details of the prevention.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77