Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Platform Topic 1 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Platform exam

Question #: 64
Topic #: 1

A price sensitive customer wants to prevent attacks on a windows 2008 Virtual Server. The server will max out at 100Mbps but needs to have 45,000 sessions to connect to multiple hosts within a data center

Which VM instance should be used to secure the network by this customer?

AVM-200

BVM-100

CVM-300

DVM-50

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Melissa at Jun 28, 2024, 08:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSE-Platform Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Fannie

4 months ago

Ooh, the VM-300 sounds fancy! But I'm feeling a bit mischievous today, so I'm gonna have to go with the VM-50. Just to see the look on the customer's face when they realize it can't even power a lightbulb, let alone their precious data center.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannan

4 months ago

I'm going to have to go with the VM-300 on this one. It's the only option that can handle the sheer number of sessions required. Besides, anything less would just be a waste of everyone's time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherelle

5 months ago

The VM-50? Really? That's like trying to use a toaster to power a data center. Come on, this is a no-brainer - VM-300 all the way!

upvoted 0 times

Peggie

3 months ago

VM-300 it is then, thanks for the input!

upvoted 0 times

...

Reuben

3 months ago

I agree with Reuben, VM-300 is the best choice for securing the network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denae

3 months ago

User Comment: The VM-50? Really? That's like trying to use a toaster to power a data center. Come on, this is a no-brainer - VM-300 all the way!

upvoted 0 times

...

Kandis

3 months ago

I think the VM-50 would be enough for the customer's needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tasia

5 months ago

Hmm, the VM-300 is tempting, but I think the VM-100 would be a better fit. It's cheaper and should still be able to handle the workload. Plus, who needs 45,000 sessions anyway? That's just showing off.

upvoted 0 times

Lucy

3 months ago

I think the VM-100 is the best choice here. No need to spend extra on something that won't be fully utilized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carissa

3 months ago

Yeah, the VM-300 might be overkill for what the customer needs. Better to save some money.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynelle

3 months ago

I agree, the VM-100 should be enough to secure the network and it's more cost-effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mireya

4 months ago

Javier: Definitely, no need to spend more than necessary on security measures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Javier

4 months ago

Yeah, VM-300 might be overkill for what the customer needs. VM-100 is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindy

4 months ago

I agree, VM-100 should be enough for the workload and it's more cost-effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delmy

5 months ago

VM-200 has higher capacity and can handle more sessions, which is important for connecting to multiple hosts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Golda

5 months ago

Why do you think VM-200 is better?

upvoted 0 times

...

Delmy

5 months ago

I disagree, I believe VM-200 would be a better choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucy

5 months ago

I'd go with the VM-200. It's a good balance between performance and cost, and should be able to handle the requirements without overkill.

upvoted 0 times

Sanda

4 months ago

VM-200 it is then, thanks for the input everyone!

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicia

4 months ago

I agree, VM-200 should be able to handle the requirements without being too expensive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alysa

4 months ago

Yeah, VM-200 seems like a good balance for performance and cost.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joesph

4 months ago

I think VM-200 would be a good choice for that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Golda

5 months ago

I think the customer should go with VM-100.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alishia

5 months ago

The VM-300 seems like the obvious choice here. With 45,000 sessions and a max throughput of 100Mbps, the VM-300 would be able to handle the load easily.

upvoted 0 times

Misty

4 months ago

I think the VM-200 might also be a good choice, it could handle the load efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Misty

5 months ago

I agree, the VM-300 is the best option for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...