Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks Exam PSE-Strata Topic 3 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's PSE-Strata exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 3
[All PSE-Strata Questions]

Which of the following statements is valid with regard to Domain Name System (DNS) sinkholing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sherita
2 months ago
B seems like the odd one out here. The other options seem more directly related to DNS sinkholing. I'm going with C as the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
Keneth
15 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think D might also be a valid statement as it mentions needing a Sinkhole license to activate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
24 days ago
I see your point, but I still think B is the most valid statement regarding DNS sinkholing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
26 days ago
I disagree, I believe C is the best answer because infected hosts connecting to the Sinkhole IP address can be identified in the traffic logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
29 days ago
I think B is correct because DNS sinkholing signatures are delivered through Vulnerability Protection updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dong
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question has a really punny sense of humor. 'Sinkhole' IP address, get it? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Giovanna
29 days ago
Haha, yeah, that's a clever play on words with 'sinkhole' IP address!
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
1 months ago
C) infected hosts connecting to the Sinkhole Internet Protocol (IP) address can be identified in the traffic logs
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 months ago
A) it requires the Vulnerability Protection profile to be enabled
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharan
2 months ago
D sounds plausible, but I'm not sure if a Sinkhole license is actually required. I'll have to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
Theresia
1 months ago
C) infected hosts connecting to the Sinkhole Internet Protocol (IP) address can be identified in the traffic logs
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
1 months ago
B) DNS sinkholing signatures are packaged and delivered through Vulnerability Protection updates
upvoted 0 times
...
Janella
2 months ago
A) it requires the Vulnerability Protection profile to be enabled
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gianna
2 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer here. DNS sinkholing allows you to identify infected hosts connecting to the sinkhole IP address in the traffic logs.
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
1 months ago
I think both options C and D are necessary for effective DNS sinkholing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
1 months ago
That's true, option D is important for activating DNS sinkholing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
2 months ago
I believe option A is necessary as well. The Vulnerability Protection profile needs to be enabled for DNS sinkholing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
2 months ago
I think option B might also be valid. DNS sinkholing signatures are delivered through Vulnerability Protection updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
2 months ago
I agree, option C is correct. It helps identify infected hosts in the traffic logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
2 months ago
But I think option D is also valid. It requires a Sinkhole license to activate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
2 months ago
I agree, option C is the correct answer. It allows you to identify infected hosts in the traffic logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dwight
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might also require a Sinkhole license to activate, so maybe the answer is D).
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
3 months ago
I agree with Evangelina, because DNS sinkholing signatures are indeed delivered through Vulnerability Protection updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) DNS sinkholing signatures are packaged and delivered through Vulnerability Protection updates.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77