Haha, yeah, I hear that. Who wants to be a container wrangler, am I right? Nah, I think the reduced operational costs is the way to go. I mean, have you seen the price tag on some of those enterprise Kubernetes support contracts?
You both make good points, but I reckon the no-need-to-manage-containers factor is the real clincher. A lot of customers just want to focus on their application code, you know? They don't want to get bogged down in all the container management stuff.
I'm not so sure about that. I think a lot of customers would be more interested in the enhanced capabilities that these managed platforms offer compared to vanilla Kubernetes. Things like auto-scaling, logging, and monitoring can be a real pain to set up on your own.
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I think the major decision factor for customers would be the reduced operational costs and management overhead. Running a container platform can be a real headache, so having a managed service take care of that sounds pretty appealing to me.
In the end, it all comes down to what suits your needs best. But reduced operational costs and management overhead seem to be a key factor for many customers.
Gracia
6 months agoSerina
6 months agoRessie
6 months agoAriel
6 months agoAleisha
6 months agoRia
6 months agoVivan
6 months agoYvonne
6 months agoLoren
6 months agoReita
6 months agoGlory
6 months ago