Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems Exam PEGACPLSA88V1 Topic 2 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPLSA88V1 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 2
[All PEGACPLSA88V1 Questions]

A Pega COE team is building a reusable component for a functionality that will be mandatory for all Pega applications that are built for the different departments of a company.

The component functionality is documented and published in a common SharePoint file, so that it is accessible by all Pega developers within the company.

Which one of the following approaches will work best for this use case?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Separate Application for Reusable Component:

Placing the component in a separate application ensures modularity and reusability.

Departments can integrate with this application as needed, ensuring consistency and reducing redundancy.

Benefits:

Centralized maintenance and updates.

Easier to manage and deploy across various departments.

Avoids embedding the component directly in multiple applications, which could lead to version control issues.


Pega Best Practices Guide

Pega Academy Course on Reusable Components and Modular Design

These answers and explanations have been verified according to the Pega Lead System Architect guidelines and best practices.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kenda
2 months ago
Ooh, I'm feeling a bit mischievous. What if we just embed the component in the enterprise app, but make it so convoluted that no one can figure it out? That'll show 'em! Just kidding, Option C is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
2 months ago
Ha! Option D is a classic case of 'reinventing the wheel.' Why would each department want to include the same component in their apps? Definitely going with C on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Alona
1 months ago
Yeah, Option C ensures that the functionality is centralized and easily accessible for all departments. It's definitely the best choice for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
1 months ago
I agree, Option C seems like the most efficient approach. Having the component in a separate application for all departments to integrate with makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
2 months ago
Option D is definitely not the way to go. It would be redundant for each department to include the same component in their apps.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margurite
2 months ago
That's a valid point. Option C does offer more flexibility for departments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is better. It allows departments to integrate the functionality when needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
3 months ago
I think option B is the best approach. It ensures consistency across all applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. Option B seems like the safest bet to me. Embedding it in both the enterprise and department apps ensures consistency and accessibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
3 months ago
Option C is the way to go! Keeping the component in a separate app allows for easy integration and maintenance across different departments. Brilliant!
upvoted 0 times
Chi
2 months ago
It definitely simplifies maintenance and updates for all the different departments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
3 months ago
I agree, having the component in a separate application makes it easier for departments to integrate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77