Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems Exam PEGACPSA88V1 Topic 1 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSA88V1 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 1
[All PEGACPSA88V1 Questions]

In the first step in a case type, the user compares data on a form to the data on a customer account. If the data matches, the case is resolved. If the data does not match, the user advances the case to update the account. Management only wants a record of the cases that update an account. What two configuration options do you use to implement this requirement ? (Choose Two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Barrett
5 months ago
Ah, the old 'update the account but only keep a record of the ones that actually changed' conundrum. C and D are the way forward, my friends. Keeping it lean and mean!
upvoted 0 times
Ngoc
4 months ago
Agreed, adding a persist case shape and applying a when condition to the first step will help us achieve that. Let's keep it efficient!
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
5 months ago
C and D are definitely the way to go. We only want to keep track of the cases that require updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arthur
6 months ago
Hmm, I'd go with A and C. Persist the case after the first step, and use a when condition to filter out the updates. Seems like the most straightforward solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
Veronika
5 months ago
Yeah, adding a persist case shape and applying a when condition make sense for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
5 months ago
I agree, A and C seem like the best options to meet the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nana
6 months ago
I think B and C are the way to go. Temporary cases and a when condition to persist only the updated ones - keeps it clean and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
Catarina
5 months ago
Configuring the starting flow to instantiate the case type as a temporary case and applying a when condition to persist only cases requiring updates seems like a good combination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
5 months ago
I think adding a persist case shape after the first step could also work to keep track of the cases that update an account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
5 months ago
I agree, using temporary cases and a when condition sounds like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leigha
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B and C are the best choices here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
6 months ago
C and D are the correct options here. Persisting only the cases that require updates makes sense, and instantiating the case as temporary until it's updated is a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
Charlene
5 months ago
Instantiating as temporary until updated is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
5 months ago
That's right, persisting only the necessary cases is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
5 months ago
C and D are the correct options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catherin
6 months ago
I think we should use option A and C for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77