Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems Exam PEGACPSA88V1 Topic 2 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSA88V1 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 2
[All PEGACPSA88V1 Questions]

In the first step in a case type, the user compares data on a form to the data on a customer account. If the data matches, the case is resolved. If the data does not match, the user advances the case to update the account. Management only wants a record of the cases that update an account. What two configuration options do you use to implement this requirement ? (Choose Two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lizette
6 months ago
I think both options A and C make sense. They both address the requirement of only keeping records of cases that update an account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
6 months ago
But wouldn't option A ensure that only cases that update the account are persisted?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
7 months ago
I think we should use option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
8 months ago
Yes, I was thinking the same thing! And Option D, configuring the first step to instantiate the case as temporary, would also help meet the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
8 months ago
Ooh, Option C looks promising! Applying a when condition to the first step to persist only the cases that require updates sounds like exactly what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
8 months ago
I agree, Option A doesn't sound right. Option B, configuring the starting flow to instantiate the case as temporary, also doesn't seem relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
Dorothy
6 months ago
I agree, that seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
7 months ago
I think we should go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glendora
8 months ago
Hmm, let me think through the options. Option A, adding a persist case shape, would record all cases regardless of whether an update was needed. That doesn't seem to fit the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
8 months ago
Yes, that's a good summary. The question is asking us to identify the two configuration options that would satisfy this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
8 months ago
This question seems to be testing our understanding of case management configuration options. From what I can tell, the key requirement is to keep a record of only the cases that require an account update.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77