Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems Exam PEGACPSA88V1 Topic 6 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSA88V1 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 6
[All PEGACPSA88V1 Questions]

In the first step in a case type, the user compares data on a form to the data on a customer account. If the data matches, the case is resolved. If the data does not match, the user advances the case to update the account. Management only wants a record of the cases that update an account. What two configuration options do you use to implement this requirement ? (Choose Two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Dominga
2 months ago
C and D, no doubt. Though I can't help but wonder if the management team is secretly plotting to create the world's most convoluted case system. Wouldn't that be a plot twist?
upvoted 0 times
Tawna
1 months ago
Well, at least we know what configuration options to use to meet their requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
1 months ago
I agree, it does seem like they are making things more complicated than necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
2 months ago
C and D are the correct options. Management sure likes to keep things interesting.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chana
2 months ago
C and D, definitely. Unless, of course, you're feeling particularly adventurous and want to try out the 'Throw the whole system out the window' approach. Just a thought.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards C and D, but I wonder if B might be a sneaky way to avoid all the case nonsense altogether. Gotta think outside the box, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
2 months ago
C and D, for sure. We don't want to waste time and storage on cases that don't need updating. Efficiency is key here.
upvoted 0 times
Helga
1 months ago
Exactly, efficiency is important in managing cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
2 months ago
That makes sense, we need to make sure only the necessary cases are stored.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
2 months ago
D) Configure the first step to instantiate the case type as a temporary case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
2 months ago
C) Apply a when condition to the first step to persist only cases requiring updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shelton
3 months ago
I agree with Mendy, option A seems like the right choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
3 months ago
I think C and D are the way to go. Persistent cases are a hassle, and we don't need all that clutter in the database.
upvoted 0 times
Samira
2 months ago
Configuring the first step to instantiate the case type as a temporary case could lead to extra data in the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
2 months ago
Persisting only cases requiring updates will keep the database clean.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
2 months ago
Adding a persist case shape after the first step might create unnecessary records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
2 months ago
I agree, C and D seem like the best options to meet the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mendy
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A makes sense because we need to persist the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B and D are the correct choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
3 months ago
I think we should use option A and C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77