Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems Exam PEGACPSA88V1 Topic 7 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSA88V1 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 7
[All PEGACPSA88V1 Questions]

Depending upon the purchase request amount, approvals cascade from the users to a loan officer, then to a director and finally to a vice president. The loan officer is the user's manager. The director is the loan officer's manager. The vice president is the director's manager.Which two approaches can you use to configure the cascading approval? (Choose two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Cassi
4 months ago
Haha, D sounds like the perfect choice if you want to get lost in a bureaucratic nightmare. I'll stick with A and B, thank you very much!
upvoted 0 times
Benton
3 months ago
B) Approval based on Authority Matrix, with a Decision Table rule to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
3 months ago
A) Approval based on Authority Matrix, with a Decision Tree rule to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roy
4 months ago
A and B for sure! The question specifically mentions 'cascading approval', so those options that utilize the Authority Matrix make the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
4 months ago
I see the rationale behind both approaches, but I think I would go with option A and B for more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
4 months ago
I agree, A and B are the way to go. Using the reporting structure alone (C and D) seems way too complicated for this approval process.
upvoted 0 times
Gabriele
3 months ago
I agree, C and D seem too complicated compared to A and B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
3 months ago
D) Approval based on Reporting structure and when conditions, using each operator's reporting to manager to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
3 months ago
C) Approval based on Reporting structure, using the workbasket manager to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
3 months ago
I think A and B are the best options for this approval process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
3 months ago
B) Approval based on Authority Matrix, with a Decision Table rule to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
4 months ago
A) Approval based on Authority Matrix, with a Decision Tree rule to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mireya
4 months ago
I prefer option C and D, as using Reporting structure seems more straightforward to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
4 months ago
I agree with Naomi, using Decision Tree and Decision Table rules makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
5 months ago
I think option A and B are the best approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
5 months ago
A and B seem like the most logical choices here. The approval process is clearly defined by the purchase request amount and the reporting structure, so using an Authority Matrix and Decision Tree or Table would be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Lawrence
4 months ago
C) Approval based on Reporting structure, using the workbasket manager to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamar
4 months ago
Yes, those options align perfectly with the defined approval process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
4 months ago
B) Approval based on Authority Matrix, with a Decision Table rule to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
5 months ago
A) Approval based on Authority Matrix, with a Decision Tree rule to determine the approver(s)
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77