Pegasystems Exam PEGAPCBA87V1 Topic 1 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCBA87V1 exam

Question #: 29
Topic #: 1

An accident claim case creates a vehicle claim case for each vehicle involved in an accident.

Which two configurations prevent the accident claim case from resolving before all vehicle claims are resolved? (Choose Two)

AAdd a wait step to the accident claim case to wait until all vehicle claims have a status of Resolved.

BAdd each vehicle claim as a child case of the accident claim.

CAdd an optional process to pause the accident case until the vehicle claims are paid.

DAdd a parallel process for vehicle claims in the accident claim resolution stage.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B

These answers are correct because they prevent the accident claim case from resolving before all vehicle claims are resolved, as per the requirement. By adding each vehicle claim as a child case of the accident claim, you can create a case hierarchy that allows you to manage related cases together. By adding a wait step to the accident claim case, you can pause the parent case until all child cases reach a specific status, such as Resolved. Reference: https://academy.pega.com/library/87/pega-certified-business-architect-pcba-87v1 (Module 5: Case Hierarchy)

by Kerry at May 18, 2024, 11:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGAPCBA87V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Myrtie

6 months ago

Wait, hold up. Where's the option to just throw the whole accident claim in the trash and start over? That's the only way to be sure, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Noah

6 months ago

I'm going with B and D, my dudes. Anything else would be like trying to drive a car with square wheels - it just ain't gonna work!

upvoted 0 times

Lavelle

5 months ago

Yeah, I can see how those configurations would prevent the accident claim case from resolving too early.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacquelyne

5 months ago

Totally agree. Adding a parallel process for vehicle claims seems like the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hubert

5 months ago

I think B and D are the way to go. It just makes sense to have each vehicle claim as a child case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scot

6 months ago

Easy, B and D all the way! Gotta keep those vehicle claims tight and running in parallel. Can't have the accident case resolving without them, that's just bad form.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willard

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Pausing the accident case until the vehicle claims are paid could work, but adding the vehicle claims as child cases feels more comprehensive.

upvoted 0 times

Earleen

5 months ago

I agree, it seems like a more comprehensive approach to ensure all vehicle claims are resolved before the accident claim case is resolved.

upvoted 0 times

...

Page

5 months ago

I think adding each vehicle claim as a child case of the accident claim is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

5 months ago

I agree, it seems like a more comprehensive approach to ensure all vehicle claims are resolved before the accident claim case is resolved.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tayna

5 months ago

Yeah, it definitely seems like the more comprehensive option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louann

5 months ago

I agree, that way everything is linked together and it's easier to track.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celia

6 months ago

I think adding each vehicle claim as a child case of the accident claim is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

6 months ago

I think adding each vehicle claim as a child case of the accident claim is a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Armanda

7 months ago

B and D seem like the right options to ensure the accident claim case can't resolve before the vehicle claims. Adding the vehicle claims as child cases and running them in parallel would work.

upvoted 0 times

Maxima

6 months ago

A: Agreed, both options B and D seem essential for preventing premature resolution of the accident claim case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamesha

6 months ago

B: Exactly, we don't want the accident claim case to resolve before all vehicle claims are taken care of.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuette

6 months ago

Agreed, those configurations will ensure that all vehicle claims are resolved before the accident claim case can be closed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shanda

6 months ago

B and D are the correct options. Adding vehicle claims as child cases and running them in parallel will prevent the accident claim case from resolving too soon.

upvoted 0 times

...