Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems Exam PEGAPCBA87V1 Topic 5 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCBA87V1 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 5
[All PEGAPCBA87V1 Questions]

An accident claim case creates a vehicle claim case for each vehicle involved in an accident.

Which two configurations prevent the accident claim case from resolving before all vehicle claims are resolved? (Choose Two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

These answers are correct because they prevent the accident claim case from resolving before all vehicle claims are resolved, as per the requirement. By adding each vehicle claim as a child case of the accident claim, you can create a case hierarchy that allows you to manage related cases together. By adding a wait step to the accident claim case, you can pause the parent case until all child cases reach a specific status, such as Resolved. Reference: https://academy.pega.com/library/87/pega-certified-business-architect-pcba-87v1 (Module 5: Case Hierarchy)


Contribute your Thoughts:

Moon
14 days ago
As someone who's been in a few fender benders, I'd go with B and D. Parallel processing and child cases sound like a surefire way to keep everything on track. Plus, it gives me flashbacks to that time a squirrel caused a 10-car pileup. Good times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
15 days ago
Hold up, is this a trick question? I'm going with B and C - pause the accident case until the vehicle claims are paid, that way nothing slips through the cracks.
upvoted 0 times
Flo
5 days ago
I think B and C are the best options to prevent the accident claim case from resolving too soon.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noel
20 days ago
Hmm, I'd say B and D. Parallel processing for vehicle claims sounds efficient, and having them as child cases makes logical sense.
upvoted 0 times
Carylon
12 days ago
I agree, having each vehicle claim as a child case of the accident claim seems like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mattie
1 months ago
A and B make the most sense. Waiting for all vehicle claims to resolve is key, and making them child cases keeps everything tied together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
1 months ago
B and D are the way to go. Adding vehicle claims as child cases and processing them in parallel ensures the accident claim can't resolve until everything is done.
upvoted 0 times
Jame
5 days ago
Exactly, it's important to have a solid process in place to ensure all aspects of the claim are properly resolved before closing the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
8 days ago
I agree, having a wait step or an optional process wouldn't guarantee that all vehicle claims are resolved before the accident claim is resolved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
9 days ago
B and D are the way to go. Adding vehicle claims as child cases and processing them in parallel ensures the accident claim can't resolve until everything is done.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gregg
1 months ago
I agree with you, Belen. Option B also seems like a good way to ensure all vehicle claims are resolved before the accident claim case closes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
2 months ago
I think option A is a good choice to prevent the accident claim case from resolving too soon.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77