Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems Exam PEGAPCLSA86V2 Topic 1 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCLSA86V2 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 1
[All PEGAPCLSA86V2 Questions]

Consider the following requirement:

case worker must be able to add a work party when creating a case

select the configuration option that fulfills this requirement

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Latosha
6 months ago
Option C for the win! I mean, come on, who doesn't love a good 'addworkObjectparty' activity? Classic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
6 months ago
This one's a head-scratcher, but I'm leaning towards Option C. Adding the addworkObjectparty activity to the assignments just seems like the logical way to handle this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Jose
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but Option B could also work if the user action is available as a local action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
5 months ago
I think Option C is the way to go too. It makes sense to add the activity to the assignments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
5 months ago
I'm not so sure about Option C. I think Option B might be a better choice to ensure the user action is available.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
5 months ago
I agree with both of you. Option C or Option B seem like the best choices for fulfilling the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but maybe Option B could work as well. Having the addparty user action available locally could be helpful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
5 months ago
I think Option C is the way to go too. It just makes sense to add the activity to the assignments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
6 months ago
I think Option C is the way to go too. It makes sense to add the activity to the assignments.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erin
7 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers were feeling pretty clever with that one! Regardless, I'm going with Option C. Seems like the most straightforward solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
Almeta
6 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It seems like the most direct way to meet the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
6 months ago
I think Option C is the best choice too. It just makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Regenia
7 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this one, but I think Option B might be the way to go. Ensuring the addparty user action is available as a local action seems like it could do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
7 months ago
Option C looks like the correct choice to me. Adding the addworkObjectparty activity to the assignments sounds like the right way to fulfill the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Kanisha
6 months ago
I agree, adding the addworkObjectparty activity to the assignments seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
6 months ago
I think option C is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77