Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems Exam PEGAPCSSA87V1 Topic 3 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCSSA87V1 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 3
[All PEGAPCSSA87V1 Questions]

Your application contains the following versions of a service level named AuthorizeClaim.

The application is being updated with a new version of the AccountManage ruleset. As part of the update, the service level is no longer circumstanced for AccountOpen cases. The update must retain the circumstancing for the other case types in the application.

Which option do you use to reset the circumstancing for the AccountOpen case type?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kati
2 months ago
Option C all the way! Withdrawing the rules is like hitting the reset button - simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
Janey
22 days ago
Yeah, it's a simple and effective way to handle the update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
28 days ago
I think it's a straightforward solution to the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
1 months ago
It's definitely the easiest way to reset the circumstancing for the AccountOpen case type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
1 months ago
I agree, withdrawing the circumstanced rules is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonie
2 months ago
Option A sounds like a lot of extra work. Why copy the rule when you can just withdraw the circumstanced ones instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
2 months ago
Personally, I think Option D is the way to go. Blocking the circumstanced rules in the AccountOpen class is a more robust solution.
upvoted 0 times
Melissia
26 days ago
Blocking the circumstanced rules will ensure the update retains the circumstancing for other case types in the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
1 months ago
I agree, blocking the circumstanced rules in the AccountOpen class seems like the most effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
2 months ago
Option D is a good choice. It will help maintain the circumstancing for other case types.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Horace
2 months ago
But if we copy the non-circumstanced rule to the AccountOpen class, we can retain the circumstancing for other case types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
3 months ago
I'd go with Option B. Making the circumstanced rules unavailable is a quick and easy fix for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
Huey
2 months ago
Blocking the circumstanced rules in the AccountOpen class could be too drastic of a measure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
2 months ago
I think withdrawing the circumstanced rules in the AccountOpen class might cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
2 months ago
But wouldn't copying the non-circumstanced rule to the AccountOpen class also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
3 months ago
I agree, Option B seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Horace
3 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
3 months ago
Option C is the way to go. Withdrawing the circumstanced rules in the AccountOpen class seems like the cleanest solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
Fatima
3 months ago
Yes, it will ensure that the circumstancing is reset for the AccountOpen case type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aaron
3 months ago
I agree, withdrawing the circumstanced rules in the AccountOpen class is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77